655 results for “General Electric”, page 8 of 33
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 13, 2006 · in the opinion
Chenot v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2006)
…and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger. Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion
Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)
…100 (1865), enacted Ch. 299 of the Acts of 1852, which was "almost a literal transcript of Lord Campbell's act.\[7\]" Stewart v. United Electric Light & Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 334 (1906). The act…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion
Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · September 27, 2004 · in the opinion
Pack v. Artuz (2004)
…preclude plaintiffs current Eighth Amendment claim, the issues resolved by the state court must have been "identical" to one or more issues raised here. See Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 22, 2009 · in the opinion
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. (2009)
…groups of atoms arranged in regular geometric pattern. Such a solid must of necessity obey the laws of definite and multiple proportions and must be as a whole electrically neutral; hence it must have a composition…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…her work history sheets, from speaking to Joan and her attorney, and from his general knowledge of the work practices of using joint compound in installing drywall—which included sanding, which creates dust, and sweeping the…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 15, 2006 · in the opinion
Weihl v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2006)
…in a general fashion. He then alleged that defendants were "regularly engaged in the business of manufacturing, designing, processing, marketing, distributing, applying, repairing, and/or selling products containing asbestos fiber for use in electrical products and…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 1, 2009 · in the opinion
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Hensley (2009)
…absent evidence that the fear was genuine and serious. Both courts affirmed decisions to reject genuine-and-serious instructions and to rely instead on general pain-and-suffering instructions to charge the jury. In so doing…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)
…the integrity of our proper role, vis a vis, the General Assembly. We explain. Maryland's cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury or wrongful death actions is codified at Md.Code (1998 Repl.Vol.), Cts…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion
Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Company (2007)
…of Mr. Gregg's exposure concretely, he maintains that the more general references in the testimony are circumstantial evidence that Mr. Gregg performed brake changes with asbestos-containing products from Appellant's store more frequently. Further…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion
Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2005)
…for the following reasons. The general prescription articles in Louisiana simply do not contemplate interruption of prescription by the filing in a court of competent jurisdiction and venue a lawsuit that is premature because it is…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion
Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)
…69-70, 286 N.E.2d 454 (1972). See Barkanic v. General Admin. of Civil Aviation of the People's Republic of China, 923 F.2d 957, 963 (2d Cir.1991) (stating that New York courts…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion
Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)
…that courts consider whether the party seeking the withdrawal or amendment has acted with due diligence. In more general terms, courts should seek to ascertain whether the aggrieved party was careless in not timely filing its…
-
Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 20, 2002
General Motors Corp. v. Kilgore (2002)
The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the trial court's denial of summary judgment and rendered judgment for General Motors, holding the Kilgores' claims preempted by the Federal Locomotive Inspection Act; two justices dissented. The Federal Locomotive…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
The Delaware Supreme Court remanded to the motion judge to reconsider the admissibility of the plaintiffs' general causation experts (Drs. Dodson and Lemen) because his factual findings misstated the record, leaving GM and Ford's challenge…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009
Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…
-
Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002
Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)
The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 2004
Goede v. Aerojet General Corporation (2004)
Stephanie Foster died of mesothelioma at age 43. Her parents and three children sued Aerojet and others for wrongful death. The opinion says that in the early 1960s her father, a machinist for Automation Progress, machined an asbestos-containing…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 1, 2000
Defendants' General List of Medical, State-of-the-Art, Economic, Liability and Damage Experts, Moake v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (2000)
Defendants' expert witness designation filed in Cause No. 90G2055, Moake et al. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation et al., in the 239th Judicial District Court, Brazoria County, Texas. It lists about 70 numbered medical, pathology,…
-
Company document · Union Carbide documents · January 18, 2001
Defendants' Third Amended General List of Medical, State-of-the-Art, Economic, Liability and Damage Experts, Villarreal v. GAF Corporation Holdings, Inc., et al. (2001)
Defendants' third amended list of expert witnesses in Robert Henry Villarreal v. GAF Corporation Holdings, Inc., et al., Cause No. 2000-05-1962-C, filed January 18, 2001 in Cameron County, Texas. It names physicians, pathologists, industrial…