No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    …Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…

  2. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…

  3. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009

    Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)

    …despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)

    …Doc. No. 13182, Tab 1 (Ford Motor Company filed this post-trial brief along with a number of Objecting Insurers); Joinder of DaimlerChrysler Corporation and Volkswagen of America, Inc. in Brief of Certain In Opposition to…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …related to a bankruptcy case is equitably remanded, it is not subject to federal appellate review on any basis. See Hawking v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 210 F.3d 540, 550 (5th Cir.2000); Sykes v…

  6. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (2006)

    …Minner, 791 A.2d at 848 (the trial court does not choose between competing reliable opinions, nor is it empowered to determine which theory is stronger). \[216\] See e.g. Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)

    …the English solicitors for the Administrators of the English companies in the Federal-Mogul Group (the "UK Debtors") applied to Justice David Richards of the English High Court of Justice ("Justice Richards") for directions that concerned…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)

    …helps the court "avoid the need to await the resolution of outside lawsuits to determine issues of liability or amount owed by means of anticipating and estimating the likely outcome of these actions." Matter of Ford…