7 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…uniform, but an "injury" does not arise until symptoms are manifested while the harm for a fatal and irreversible "disease" arises as soon as the cellular change develops. Our recent decisions in Ford \[Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Sledz v. Flintkote Co. (2002)
…applicable under state law. For example, in Sasser v. Ford Motor Co., 126 F.Supp.2d 1333 (M.D.Ala.2001), the plaintiff filed a complaint in state court against nondiverse defendants on July 31, 1998…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…2d at 996. In adopting 1990 as the critical date when the cause of action arose, the court, though supposedly applying Grimshaw, essentially applied the manifestation test. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 27, 2001 · in the opinion
Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge (2001)
…excerpts from the deposition transcripts of F. Ford Loker and Paul Bekman to support its argument: Q: I'm not focusing on whether it's wrong to give a percentage. My focus is would it be…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 30, 2002 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois v. Gianotti (2002)
…Patrick Burns (Gerry H. Tostanoski and Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP, on [\283] the brief), Baltimore, for Owens-Illinois, Inc. B. Ford Davis (Gardner M. Duvall, Dwight W. Stone, II and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, on the brief)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 13, 2001 · in the opinion
Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge (2001)
…scheduling order. Miles offers the testimony of one of its experts, F. Ford Loker, to support this argument. Loker stated that "there \[wa\]s no reason to believe that any party would have objected, or that…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion
Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)
…and holdings in these §1738 cases are entirely consistent with the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Constitutional full faith and credit cases. See, for example, Ford v. Ford, 371 U.S. 187, 192, 83 S…