24 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · October 16, 2006
McPhee v. Ford Motor Company (2006)
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Ford Motor Company, rejecting Marvin McPhee's claim over his wife Elaine's fatal mesothelioma because his medical expert's declaration contradicted his deposition and was too conclusory…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
…Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2007
Cepeda v. AC&S, Inc. (2007)
The trial court denied Ford's and General Motors' motion to exclude the CCAR S/P2 training materials, granted their motion to exclude other CCAR web site material and the videotape, and granted plaintiff Cepeda's…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007
Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)
…Ford, General Motors and Honeywell lost their challenge to the Chapins' expert evidence (one judge dissented). A trial court acting as gatekeeper under MRE 702 and MCL 600.2955(1) need not resolve genuine scientific disputes…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2006
Berger v. Amchem Prods. (2006)
The court denied DaimlerChrysler's motions (joined by Ford and General Motors) to preclude evidence that brake and clutch dust causes asbestos disease, to dismiss the complaints, and for a Frye hearing, so the plaintiffs (Berger…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
The Court of Appeal affirmed the nonsuit for the friction-product defendants (DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Mercedes-Benz USA, Volkswagen of America and Pneumo Abex), holding that Indiana's two-year statute of limitations barred the Cossmans' claims…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009
Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 23, 2004
In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2004)
The court of appeals conditionally granted Sears and Ford's mandamus petitions, ordering the trial court to vacate its discovery orders because the requests for workers' compensation files, board minutes and violation records were overly broad…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)
James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 13, 2003
Polito v. Burns Int'l Services Corp. (Matter of Asbestos Litig., 2003)
…repaired over a number of years. The remaining defendants were Burns International (formerly Borg-Warner), DaimlerChrysler, Ford and General Motors, all involved in making or distributing brake products. Before trial, they moved to exclude certain evidence…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 20, 2006 · in the opinion
Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2006)
…HARDWARE; EXPERT CYCLE; FIDALGO INSULATION; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.; GARY BANG; GATKE CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; GLOBAL MOTORSPORTS GROUP; GREAT WALL MANUFACTURING; HANSON PERMANENTE CEMENT, INC.; HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC.; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion
Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)
…KimberlyClark Corp., Walter B. Gallagher Co., Atco, Borg-Warner Corp., Columbia Boiler Co., Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Maremont Corp., Pa Brake Bonding, Pneumo Abex Corp., United Gilsonite…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)
…at hand and the reasoning is sound [\588] and persuasive, citation to and reliance on the unpublished opinion is appropriate. Bob Tatone Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 197 F.3d 787, 790 (6th Cir.1999)…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005 · in the opinion
Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)
…at 57. Brown recalled that he worked on various makes of cars, including General Motors, Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, and Ford. After removing old brakes from a car, Brown would take them to the dealership for that…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 28, 2009 · in the opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder (2009)
…redact this portion of the letter for use at trial. See MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Next, we turn to the second issue concerning the exclusion…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · December 23, 2009 · in the opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Guilder (2009)
…redact this portion of the letter for use at trial. See MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 832 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Next, we turn to the second issue concerning the exclusion…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 10, 2007 · in the opinion
Caradonna v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2007)
…New York, New York, Attention Timothy J. McHugh, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant General Motors Corporation. Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., Newark, New Jersey, Attention Bhavna Changrani, Attorneys for Defendant LIRR and MTA. FREEDMAN, J. In…