103 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 6
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 10, 2008
Ford Motor Company v. Miller (2008)
The Texas Court of Appeals reversed the $10,000,000 jury verdict and rendered judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller and that John Roland had no compensable injury or…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · October 16, 2006
McPhee v. Ford Motor Company (2006)
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Ford Motor Company, rejecting Marvin McPhee's claim over his wife Elaine's fatal mesothelioma because his medical expert's declaration contradicted his deposition and was too conclusory…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 15, 2007
Honer v. Ford Motor Company (2007)
The Court of Appeal reversed the summary judgments for Ford Motor Company and Merck & Co. and remanded with directions to deny both motions, so plaintiff Eileen Honer prevailed on appeal. Under Code of Civil Procedure section…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · April 24, 2007
State EX rel. Ford Motor Company v. Nixon (2007)
…of Consortium; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Ford Motor Company Claycomo assembly plant; Ford automotive plant in Claycomo, Claycomo worked at the Ford automotive plant Ford automotive plant in Claycomo Claycomo over thirty years until 1996
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 2007
Varner v. Ford Motor Co. (2007)
The court of appeals affirmed summary judgment for Ford Motor Company, holding Yvonne Varner's workers' compensation death claim was filed too late. Under R.C. 4123.85, a workers' compensation death claim from occupational disease…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 5, 2005
Snyder v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)
…Workers' Compensation; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Clingerman facility; Ford Motor Company Lima plant; General Dynamics Lima facility; General Dynamics facility, Lima; Clingerman facility, Bellefontaine; Ford Motor Company, Lima employee General Dynamics facility Lima 1984-1993;…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
…appeals court in the negative, holding that Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller, which favored Ford and went against the Miller plaintiffs' $9.5 million Texas verdict theory. Under Michigan law, a duty depends on…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
…Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2007
Cepeda v. AC&S, Inc. (2007)
The trial court denied Ford's and General Motors' motion to exclude the CCAR S/P2 training materials, granted their motion to exclude other CCAR web site material and the videotape, and granted plaintiff Cepeda's…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007
Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)
…Ford, General Motors and Honeywell lost their challenge to the Chapins' expert evidence (one judge dissented). A trial court acting as gatekeeper under MRE 702 and MCL 600.2955(1) need not resolve genuine scientific disputes…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2006
Berger v. Amchem Prods. (2006)
The court denied DaimlerChrysler's motions (joined by Ford and General Motors) to preclude evidence that brake and clutch dust causes asbestos disease, to dismiss the complaints, and for a Frye hearing, so the plaintiffs (Berger…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
The Court of Appeal affirmed the nonsuit for the friction-product defendants (DaimlerChrysler, Ford, Mercedes-Benz USA, Volkswagen of America and Pneumo Abex), holding that Indiana's two-year statute of limitations barred the Cossmans' claims…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009
Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 23, 2004
In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2004)
The court of appeals conditionally granted Sears and Ford's mandamus petitions, ordering the trial court to vacate its discovery orders because the requests for workers' compensation files, board minutes and violation records were overly broad…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
…Statute of Limitations; Statute of Repose; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Cummins Engine Company plant; Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Columbus employee of Cummins Engine Company Cummins Engine Company, Inc. Columbus 1942-1978
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…
-
Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · July 5, 2002
Chavers v. General Motors Corp. (2002)
The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for General Motors, AlliedSignal and Ford, rejecting the claims of Deidra Chavers over her husband's mesothelioma death. Arkansas adopts the 'frequency, regularity, and proximity…