21 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 17, 2009
Kirks v. General Electric Company (2009)
…district court denied the plaintiffs' motions to remand both cases to Delaware state court, holding that General Electric had established federal officer removal jurisdiction. A contractor may remove under the federal officer removal statute, construed broadly…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · June 23, 2003 · in the opinion
In re Combustion Engineering (2003)
…Parties" under the Plan. In 2002 an affiliate of Debtor and indirect subsidiary of ABB sold ABB's structured finance business to certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of the General Electric Company. These purchasers are concerned…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation v. Adel Wiggins Group (2009)
…products. \[8\] Compare, e.g., the affidavits submitted by General Electric Company in Kirks v. General Electric Company, Civ. No. 08-856-SLR, (D. Del. Sept. 17, 2009) and Wiersma v. General Electric Company, Civ. No…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
…deprived the trial judge of the opportunity to deal with the problem when it arose. Such inaction is deemed a waiver of any resulting error for appellate purposes. (Emphasis added.); Delaware Electric Coop., Inc. v. Duphily…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009
General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)
The Delaware Supreme Court remanded to the motion judge to reconsider the admissibility of the plaintiffs' general causation experts (Drs. Dodson and Lemen) because his factual findings misstated the record, leaving GM and Ford's challenge…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009
Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · January 30, 2004
Roca v. EI du Pont de Nemours and Co. (2004)
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court's summary judgment for DuPont, General Motors, DaimlerChrysler and Rhone-Poulenc, holding that Roca waived his Section 343 claim by not raising it in his opening brief. An…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 29, 2009
In re WR Grace & Co. (2009)
The State of California, Department of General Services, filed sixteen property damage claims in W.R. Grace's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The claims concerned asbestos-containing materials Grace made that were in sixteen state-owned buildings…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 9, 2006
In re Asbestos Litigation (2006)
The court denied DaimlerChrysler's motion in limine to exclude the plaintiffs' experts on general causation, so the plaintiffs' experts may testify that automotive friction products increase the risk of asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. Under…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…for hazards faced by an independent contractor's employee unless it actively controlled the manner and method of the work, and general superintendence is not enough. DP&L did not actively control the work at Edgemoor…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion
Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)
§ 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)
…will probably have a decreased purchasing power at the time of the dollar's theoretical use in the future. In general, plaintiffs will try to project lower future interest rates than will be suggested by defendants…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Riedel v. Ici Americas Inc. (2009)
…Liability. The ALI drafting committee and general members of the ALI approved the substance of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (with the exception of two comments not relevant here) in 2005. The…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · January 26, 2004 · in the opinion
In re ACandS, Inc. (2004)
…DE, John L. Horan, Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson, Lincoln, NE, Kartar S. Khalsa, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Steven K. Kortanek, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, Wilmington, DE, Carl N…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
…the Plan B Settlement as the default, or fallback, settlement in the event that the court could not approve the Plan A Settlement.\[11\] Debtors' former General Counsel, John Gasparovic, testified that during "the negotiations of…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2006)
…that is, that \the dose makes the poison,' which refers to the general tendency for a greater dose of a toxin to cause greater severity of responses in individuals, as well as greater frequency of response…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston (2005)
…jurisdictions, to deter tortious conduct which ended more than twenty years ago. Adjusting the Forecast to Account for Changed Conditions There is general agreement that the values assigned to valid claims for mesothelioma, lung cancer, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)
…however, rule out the desirability of considering trends general to the industry, particularly regarding the rate of filing of claims. The total number of claims to be expected should be estimated. The estimation of claims should…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 28, 2001 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…s), the uniformity of source of the injury or wrongful death, and the general status of pending cases in the state courts and the effect a consolidation would have on them. \[13\] See Reply of Garlock…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion
In re Usg Corp. (2003)
…In In re USG Corporation, one sees these general truths played out in detail. The debtors argues that "\[t\]he vast majority of asbestos personal injury suits filed today are meritless nonmalignant claims of minor pleural…