19 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004 · in the opinion
Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)
…independent contract." Cutlip, 22 Md. App. at 683. The necessary control under § 343 is analogous to the control under § 414. Wells v. General Electric Co., 807 F. Supp. 1202, 1211 (D. Md. 1992). As discussed, supra…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 2, 2006 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Benjamin (2006)
…default on another person."\[7\] Binnix v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 593 F.Supp. 1180, 1182 (Md. 1984) (quoting Stewart v. United Electric Light and Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 343, 65 A. 49, 53 (1906))…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…appropriate. Appellants assert that a determination as to whether there was insufficient knowledge of the manufacturer or of the scientific field in general would have been relevant in order to determine whether the Kent cigarettes, and…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion
Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)
…100 (1865), enacted Ch. 299 of the Acts of 1852, which was "almost a literal transcript of Lord Campbell's act.\[7\]" Stewart v. United Electric Light & Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 334 (1906). The act…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)
…the integrity of our proper role, vis a vis, the General Assembly. We explain. Maryland's cap on noneconomic damages in personal injury or wrongful death actions is codified at Md.Code (1998 Repl.Vol.), Cts…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion
Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)
…that courts consider whether the party seeking the withdrawal or amendment has acted with due diligence. In more general terms, courts should seek to ascertain whether the aggrieved party was careless in not timely filing its…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003
Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)
…Sparrows Point plant (steel mill); General Motors plant, Halethorpe; Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point, Sparrows Point; General Motors plant, Halethorpe, Halethorpe pipe fitter Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point Sparrows Point 1946-1979; warehouseman General Motors plant, Halethorpe Halethorpe
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 27, 2001
Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge (2001)
…The settlement was also below the highest likely verdict. The court found no proof that Parler's handling of a general release caused harm. It entered summary judgment for Parler and awarded Royal $1,655,916…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion
Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)
The general rule should be that in cases where a plaintiff could easily have joined in the earlier action or where, either for the reasons discussed above or for other reasons, the application of offensive estoppel…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)
685 (2000), addressing "whether the general rule (that no loss of consortium claim exists for an ante-nuptial tort) applies in cases where, at the time of the marriage, the injury to the spouse is latent…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)
685 (2000), addressing "whether the general rule (that no loss of consortium claim exists for an ante-nuptial tort) applies in cases where, at the time of the marriage, the injury to the spouse is latent…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009
Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)
…to residents. Foreseeability that its products will arrive and cause injury, a customer's choice of port, and general trade advertising do not satisfy this. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: Port of Baltimore; Port…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Csr Limited (2008)
…of Baltimore for sugar deliveries from which CSR derived substantial revenue. Taylor next contends that she presented evidence satisfying the due process requirements for Maryland's exercise of both specific and general personal jurisdiction over CSR…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005 · in the opinion
National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)
…large number of asbestos-related bodily injury claims filed against it. Wallace & Gale had purchased comprehensive general liability policies and excess policies from numerous insurers during the decades it installed asbestos-containing insulation materials. In 1994…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 13, 2001 · in the opinion
Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge (2001)
…an asbestos lawsuit that was barred by limitations, res judicata, and a general release executed by the plaintiff in a prior lawsuit! In the wake of this monstrosity, the parties footing the bill and successive sets…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 30, 2002 · in the opinion
Owens-Illinois v. Gianotti (2002)
…v. Martin, 14 Pa. D. & C.3d 325, 328 (1980)); and "the time of the accident" (Hendrix v. General Motors, 146 Cal.App.3d 296, 193 Cal.Rptr. 922, 927 (1983)). See Miles, 58 Md.App…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 19, 2007 · in the opinion
O'connor v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (2007)
…behalf. (Compl. ¶¶ 5-6, 8, 11-15.) These general allegations of injury, suffice at this early stage of the litigation. See White Tail Park, 413 F.3d at 459 (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 561…