10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 26, 2003 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn. (2003)
…269:13-15, 271:15-17, 272:16-21. The indirect cost pool for the Superfund program includes indirect costs such as rent, electricity, training, management and supervision of employees, and the management and implementation of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · June 8, 2006
United States v. Grace (2006)
…the government had known enough by 1992 to charge. The court denied the motion. It found the defendants had described the lost testimony only in general, speculative terms. In several instances the testimony would likely have…
-
Court case · Montana Supreme Court · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion
Orr v. State (2004)
In doing so, the Legislature created a number of statutes under the heading "State Board of Health," which created the board and set forth its general duties, one of which was to "make investigations, disseminate information…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · March 3, 2006 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace (2006)
…upon the history of the registration process, which the Court interpreted to include a general understanding that registration was a discrete act to be completed on a designated date, and that failure to so comply at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 24, 2006 · in the opinion
US v. Grace (2006)
…EPA. The Government alleges that Defendants Stringer and EPA made the following misleading statements in their CERCLA 104(e) response: that W.R. GRACE did not provide vermiculite to the general public; that W.R. GRACE…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion
US v. Grace (2005)
…to an EPA CERCLA 104(e) Request for Information, to wit: that W.R. GRACE did not provide vermiculite to the general public; that W.R. GRACE employees did not regularly leave the mine with tremolite…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · January 11, 2005 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace (2005)
…In this case, Dr. Bronson opines that the individual Defendants are prejudiced by pretrial publicity despite their general lack of name recognition because jurors will impute Grace's conduct to the individual Defendants. Dr. Bronson calls…
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · July 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Johnson v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (2009)
…a dryer tender and 6695 hours as a dryer stacker.\[19\] The dryer tender was responsible for the general day-to-day operation of the dryers.\[20\] The dryer stacker was responsible for operating the grading…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · February 10, 2009 · in the opinion
US v. Grace (2009)
…of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Epidemiology is the study of disease patterns in a population to reach conclusions about general causation.\[3\] Dr. [\1147] Lemen's Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure lists…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · March 9, 2001 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace & Co. (2001)
…1015-16 (discussing permanent regulatory intrusions on the use of land or buildings and the "deprivation of all economically feasible use" as exceptions to the general rule that takings questions must be analyzed in intensively factual…