No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

42 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003

    Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)

    …Wheeler, Aurora Pump, Gulf Engineering, Ingersoll Rand, Walworth, Crosby Valve, General Electric, Warren Pumps, Crane, A.W. Chesterton and Coffin Turbo Pump, and dismissed Lindstrom's claims against them with prejudice. Under maritime product liability law…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 21, 2004

    Jessop v. Acf Industries, LLC (2004)

    …Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Topeka shops and rail yard; Topeka, Kansas rail yard of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Topeka electrician Topeka, Kansas rail yard of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Topeka sixteen year career

  3. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)

    …125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993),\[2\] and its progeny, Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 470 Mich. 749, 685 N.W.2d 391 (2004), General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Wright v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …Co., Crane Packing, Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Ford Motor Co., Foster Wheeler Corp., Garlock, Inc., General Electric Co., General Motors Corp., Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 7, 2005 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Crown Cork & Seal Company (2005)

    …UNIROYAL, INC..; E.J. BARTELLS SETTLEMENT TRUST; CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION; FLINTKOTE CORPORATION; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; and ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., Defendants. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., as successor-in-interest to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., Respondent. No…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …Crane Packing, Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Dresser Industries, Inc., Foster Wheeler Corp., Inc., Garlock, Inc., General Electric Co., Georgia-Pacific Corp., Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hajoca Plumbing Co., J.H. France Refractories…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …the language used is identical to the language used in an affidavit of David Hobson, which was submitted by General Electric Co. in the case of Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205…

  8. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    …deprived the trial judge of the opportunity to deal with the problem when it arose. Such inaction is deemed a waiver of any resulting error for appellate purposes. (Emphasis added.); Delaware Electric Coop., Inc. v. Duphily…

  9. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Gomcsak v. US Steel Corp. (2008)

    …McClelland, Attorney at Law, for Appellee. Timothy McGrail, Assistant Ohio Attorney General, for Administrator of the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation. DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …he performed automotive repairs and, from the early 1950's to the early 1980's, he used brakes from Ford, Chrysler, General Motors, Pep Boys, and NAPA stores. Deposition of Jon Burger, dated 3/29/06…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2007 · in the opinion

    IN the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. (2007)

    …Maltese v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 89 NY2d 955 (1997) which held that general awareness of the risk of injury to persons exposed to asbestos without the opportunity to warn was insufficient to establish recklessness. Defendant argues…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ballard v. Anchor Packing Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2009)

    …and floor tilers, pipe fitters, boiler workers, and electrician. Robert Killenberger Mr. Robert Killenberger recently died from mesothelioma at the age of 65. Mr. Killenberger was allegedly exposed to asbestos primarily from the variety of jobs…

  14. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 12, 2009 · in the opinion

    Tatera v. FMC Corp. (2009)

    …Mulhern, the court noted that the "stream of commerce" requirement is consistent with the application of § 402A in Wisconsin, citing Barter v. General Motors Corp., 70 Wis.2d 796, 235 N.W.2d 523 (1975). Mulhern…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Crowder V AW Chesterton Co. (2009)

    …date the party last parted with possession or control of the product" constituted a substantive law (see, Connecticut General Statute §52-577\[a\]). In Blatz v. Westinehouse Electric Corp., 274 A.D.2d 491 (2nd Dept.…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion

    Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Company (2007)

    …of Mr. Gregg's exposure concretely, he maintains that the more general references in the testimony are circumstantial evidence that Mr. Gregg performed brake changes with asbestos-containing products from Appellant's store more frequently. Further…

  17. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    The Delaware Supreme Court remanded to the motion judge to reconsider the admissibility of the plaintiffs' general causation experts (Drs. Dodson and Lemen) because his factual findings misstated the record, leaving GM and Ford's challenge…

  18. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009

    Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)

    …despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2007

    Cepeda v. AC&S, Inc. (2007)

    The trial court denied Ford's and General Motors' motion to exclude the CCAR S/P2 training materials, granted their motion to exclude other CCAR web site material and the videotape, and granted plaintiff Cepeda's…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 10, 2006

    Berger v. Amchem Prods. (2006)

    The court denied DaimlerChrysler's motions (joined by Ford and General Motors) to preclude evidence that brake and clutch dust causes asbestos disease, to dismiss the complaints, and for a Frye hearing, so the plaintiffs (Berger…