No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 4, 2009

    Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc. (2009)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the estate's claims against General Electric, holding they were not product liability civil actions and were therefore barred by Oregon's 10-year negligence…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …Moraine, a Division of General Motors Corporation, Surabla Manufacturing Company, Fibreboard Corporation, Flexitallic Gasket Co., Inc., The Flintkote Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, GAF Corporation, Garlock, Inc., General Electric Company, General Gasket Corporation, General Refractories Company…

  3. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …by overhead electrical wires\]; see also Rest.2d Torts, § 343A \[possessor of land liable for obvious danger if "the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such. . . obviousness"\].) The question before us is how these general principles…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …of trial, the court barred the defendant from putting into evidence a publication of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) setting forth standards respecting the manufacture of electric hoists and other industrial lifting equipment. The…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 2, 2006 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Benjamin (2006)

    …default on another person."\[7\] Binnix v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 593 F.Supp. 1180, 1182 (Md. 1984) (quoting Stewart v. United Electric Light and Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 343, 65 A. 49, 53 (1906))…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2006)

    …Inc. ("ELI"), formerly known as Louisiana Power & Light Company ("LP & L"). ELI was sued in its capacity as owner of Waterford Steam Electric Station — Units 1, 2, and 3 located in Taft, Louisiana ("Waterford 1 & 2…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)

    …38 P.3d 1081). However, the observations in Grahn about general premises liability remain good law. In Grahn, as in the case before us, the premises owner challenged a generic jury instruction describing a landowner's…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …100 (1865), enacted Ch. 299 of the Acts of 1852, which was "almost a literal transcript of Lord Campbell's act.\[7\]" Stewart v. United Electric Light & Power Co., 104 Md. 332, 334 (1906). The act…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …her work history sheets, from speaking to Joan and her attorney, and from his general knowledge of the work practices of using joint compound in installing drywall—which included sanding, which creates dust, and sweeping the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…

  11. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …was proximately caused by his exposure to asbestos-containing products provided by the Defendants. The Indiana General Assembly has enacted two statutes that limit the period of time within which individuals can file product liability claims…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)

    …225] The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio acts as an exception to the general rules of prescription by suspending the running of prescription when the circumstances of the case fall into one…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 5, 2006 · in the opinion

    Dankenbrink v. Foster Wheeler (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2006)

    …products during overlapping periods of time from the 1940's to the 1990's so that the state of the art testimony and other expert testimony in a general way will be substantially common to all…