No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    The Kentucky Supreme Court held that General Electric was not entitled to summary judgment on its exclusive-remedy defense and that nine of the sixteen premises owners in the Rehm case were, with seven owners' claims…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)

    …responsible for taking asbestos fiber from bags and mixing it in five gallon buckets with a substance called Glyptal, which was made by General Electric. He then applied the mixture to the generator's spark plugs. {…

  3. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 12, 2001 · in the opinion

    Bailey v. North American Refractories Co. (2001)

    …the electrical shop on direct current (DC) motors. Gray testified that he mainly worked with General Electric or Westinghouse motors. Specifically, he stated: I mainly worked on DC equipment and it was Westinghouse and General Electric…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2008 · in the opinion

    Gomcsak v. US Steel Corp. (2008)

    …McClelland, Attorney at Law, for Appellee. Timothy McGrail, Assistant Ohio Attorney General, for Administrator of the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation. DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 29, 2005 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Abex Corp./electro Alloys Div. v. Indus. Comm. OF Ohio (2005)

    …on the claim. The DHO explained: The District Hearing Officer finds that it is uncontroverted that claimant suffers from inoperable mesothelioma that was diagnosed on or about 07/20/1999 at Fairview General Hospital. This District…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…

  7. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion

    Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)

    …concluded that the plaintiff in McIntosh was not entitled to a remedy under Section 12 because "the General Assembly has determined that injuries occurring ten years after the product was delivered to a user are not…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …Sparrows Point plant (steel mill); General Motors plant, Halethorpe; Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point, Sparrows Point; General Motors plant, Halethorpe, Halethorpe pipe fitter Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point Sparrows Point 1946-1979; warehouseman General Motors plant, Halethorpe Halethorpe

  9. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2003)

    …applied. One statute covers asbestos claims against those who mined and sold asbestos. The other is the general ten-year statute of repose for product claims. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. The…

  10. Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)

    of a general duty to exercise reasonable care in preventing foreseeable harm ... is fair and just." \[Olivo, supra at 402, quoting Hopkins v Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 NJ 426, 438; 625 A2d 1110 (1993) (emphasis added…

  11. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · April 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    Parker v. Henry A. Petter Supply Co. (2005)

    …Mine and Mill Supply's liability and that Parker could have pursued IRECO as a defendant. The general rule regarding liability of a corporate successor in Kentucky is that a purchasing corporation does not assume liability…

  12. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · March 28, 2007

    Zinc Corp. OF America v. Reeder (2007)

    …s workers' compensation statute applies only to silicosis and asbestosis, not mesothelioma, so the general last-injurious-exposure rule applies, under which the last employer is liable without a minimum quantity of exposure. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  13. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…

  14. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion

    Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …disease and its cause constitutes a new injury and the basis for a separate cause of action. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within…

  15. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rahmes v. Adience Inc. (2007)

    …contracting or selling or installation business? {¶ 23} "A. Yes. {¶ 24} "Q. And general idea, how far outside of Cincinnati, Cincinnati area would some of these operations take place? {¶ 25} "A. Do you have a time framework…

  16. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)

    …sua sponte order Owens-Illinois, Inc. dismissed from this appeal. \[3\] The General Assembly effectively overruled paragraph two of the syllabus to Horton with the adoption of R.C. 2307.96(B), effective to cases filed…

  17. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion

    West v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2005)

    …America, Inc., a Delaware corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Nuturn Corporation; Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation; General Motors, a Delaware corporation; G.I. Joe's, an Oregon corporation; Metalclad Insulation Corporation, a…

  18. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 10, 2002 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2002)

    …1995), trans. denied. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within ten years after the delivery of the product to the initial user or consumer…

  19. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · November 22, 2004 · in the opinion

    Gibson v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board (2004)

    …We note that, in general, questions concerning the admission and exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the tribunal and are not to be reversed on appeal absent a finding of an abuse of…

  20. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …was proximately caused by his exposure to asbestos-containing products provided by the Defendants. The Indiana General Assembly has enacted two statutes that limit the period of time within which individuals can file product liability claims…