No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

30 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    The Kentucky Supreme Court held that General Electric was not entitled to summary judgment on its exclusive-remedy defense and that nine of the sixteen premises owners in the Rehm case were, with seven owners' claims…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · October 27, 2008

    Carroll v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …Carrolls' motion to remand, holding that defendants Viad, General Electric and Buffalo Pumps properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant may remove under the federal officer statute, 28 U.S.C. …

  3. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005

    Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)

    James Rehm, a millwright employed by Rapid Installation from about 1975 to 1982, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2001 and died in 2002. He, and later his wife as executrix and his children, sued sixteen companies that owned the facilities where…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, individually and as successor to The Duriron Company, Inc., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, FROMM ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORP., GARLOCK, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, GENERAL SUPPLY COMPANY, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, GREENE…

  5. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Simonetta v. Viad Corporation (2008)

    …TRUST; AQUA-CHEM, INC., individually and as successor to CLEAVER-BROOKS COMPANY; FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to DE LAVAL TURBINE, INC…

  6. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2007)

    …Dana Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; General Electric Company; Foster-Wheeling USA Corporation; Warren Pumps, Inc.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Borg-Warner Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; General Motors Corporation; and Genuine Parts Company. None…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …retain an expert in every finished product manufacturer's line of business and second-guess the finished product manufacturer whenever any of its employees received any information about any potential problems.'" (Artiglio v. General Electric Co.

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 2, 2004 · in the opinion

    Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. (2004)

    …Torrejon was uncertain as to the length of time he was there. • General Electric — worked on boilers and turbines and the heating and cooling system. • Colonial House (a hotel) in Las Vegas — 1959 to early 1960…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …specifications does not deprive them of the component parts defense. In Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817\], the defendant manufactured silicone in accordance with "particular specifications…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · February 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Fleischman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)

    …Ctr., Inc., Ky., 807 S.W.2d 476 (1991)." Gafford v. General Electric Co., 997 F.2d 150, 165 (6th Cir. 1993). DISCUSSION As mentioned supra, the Defendant asserts that the 1986 release signed by Mr…

  11. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 21, 2002 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (2002)

    …I. ¶ 2. Jerold Anderson worked for many years as a machinist for the Wisconsin Electric Power Company at its Oak Creek power plant. There were eight coal-fired boilers at the plant during this time. The…

  12. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 12, 2009 · in the opinion

    Tatera v. FMC Corp. (2009)

    …Mulhern, the court noted that the "stream of commerce" requirement is consistent with the application of § 402A in Wisconsin, citing Barter v. General Motors Corp., 70 Wis.2d 796, 235 N.W.2d 523 (1975). Mulhern…

  13. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)

    …Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…

  14. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 5, 2005

    Snyder v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)

    …reversed the May 2005 summary judgment for Ford, General Dynamics and the Administrator, and remanded for a determination of her right to participate in the workers' compensation fund. To participate in the workers' compensation fund for…

  15. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006

    Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)

    …for hazards faced by an independent contractor's employee unless it actively controlled the manner and method of the work, and general superintendence is not enough. DP&L did not actively control the work at Edgemoor…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hebert v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (2002)

    …Ed.2d 379 (1994). Only if the appellate court finds an abuse of that discretion may it examine prior awards of general damages to determine the amount the trier of fact reasonable could award. Theriot v…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 18, 2008 · in the opinion

    Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co. (2008)

    …and which were purportedly critical to the removal determination), Buffalo Pumps instead proffered its factual basis for removal in broad, general terms. According to the notice, Buffalo Pumps had satisfied the statutory requirements for removal during…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …plant; Barton Brands Distillery; Anaconda Aluminum, Louisville; Brown & Williamson general laborer and maintenance machinist Anaconda Aluminum Louisville 1963-1973; maintenance worker Brown & Williamson 1973-1982; worker in the whiskey filtration department Barton Brands Distillery 1959-1990

  19. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…

  20. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 3, 2008 · in the opinion

    Benard v. Eagle, Inc. (2008)

    …exceptional circumstances, especially in light of the general speedy manner in which this Court handles applications for rehearing when this Court is notified of the urgency of the need for prompt action. In Centanni v. Ford…