14 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · January 16, 2008 · in the opinion
Fossen v. Midamerican Energy Company (2008)
…4 at Port Neal. \[2\] Plaintiff filed an action asserting nine separate counts against fifty defendants. \[3\] In the same ruling, the court denied the motions for summary judgment filed by General Electric and Foster Wheeler.
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · June 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2005)
In contrast, the previously defined exceptions to the general rule of nonliability for negligence of an independent contractor had found the principal liable not for its own negligence, but for negligence of its contractor in carrying…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2001 · in the opinion
Franklin v. Usx Corp. (2001)
…extent these arose prior to the closing. In addition, we note that the bill of sale contained specific and clear provisions relating to the buyer's general non-assumption of liability. It stated that "\[t\]he…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · November 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Van Fossen v. MidAmerican Energy Co. (2009)
…as the agent of the other owners, engaged Ebasco Services (Ebasco) as the general contractor for the construction of Units 3 and 4. The construction contracts gave Ebasco full control over its employees and the construction…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 2000
Primary diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: case report and update of therapy
…on light microscopy, histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry. Patient had no further treatment because of her poor general conditions. She died 4 months later. Update of treatment is briefly described with particular attention to multimodality approach (surgery, chemotherapy…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000
Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)
…Court reversed the Court of Appeal, holding that Mitchell's second action (for mesothelioma) was not time-barred and that Asbestos Corporation made a general appearance in the first action, so the plaintiffs prevailed on both…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)
…and the landowner should have anticipated the harm, including where it saw workers going unprotected. A general verdict stands if the evidence supports any one theory of liability. Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2008
Barnes v. AO Smith Water Products Co. (2008)
…the Montross, Perdicaro, Enea and Iqbal cases separate, over the defendants' general opposition. Under CPLR 602(a), actions with common questions of law or fact may be tried jointly. The Malcolm factors guide the choice, and…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 2005
Computed tomographic characterization of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma
…CT scans available for review. A Z-score was used to evaluate the incidence of cancer at a particular anatomic site as compared to a general incidence of disease at all sites. CT was analyzed by…
-
Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · October 7, 2004 · in the opinion
Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (2004)
…Spagnoletti, Attorney General for the District of Columbia, and Edward E. Schwab, Acting Deputy Attorney General for the District of Columbia at the time the statement was filed, filed a statement in lieu of brief for…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 6, 2004 · in the opinion
Roberts v. ACandS, Inc. (2004)
…out of and in the course of the employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensable, except where such diseases follow as an incident…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)
…§§ 688, et seq., the General Admiralty and Maritime law, and traditional product liability law. ECF No. 1. Lindstrom claims that he contracted this disease as a result of his work-life exposures to asbestos and asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 8, 2007 · in the opinion
Roberts v. ACandS, Inc. (2007)
…statute. Id. A. Article I, Section 23, the Privileges and Immunities Clause The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides: "The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon…