11 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 12, 2001 · in the opinion
Bailey v. North American Refractories Co. (2001)
…the electrical shop on direct current (DC) motors. Gray testified that he mainly worked with General Electric or Westinghouse motors. Specifically, he stated: I mainly worked on DC equipment and it was Westinghouse and General Electric…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2008 · in the opinion
Gomcsak v. US Steel Corp. (2008)
…McClelland, Attorney at Law, for Appellee. Timothy McGrail, Assistant Ohio Attorney General, for Administrator of the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation. DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion
Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)
…concluded that the plaintiff in McIntosh was not entitled to a remedy under Section 12 because "the General Assembly has determined that injuries occurring ten years after the product was delivered to a user are not…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 2003
Brown & Root, Inc. v. Shelton (2003)
…with mesothelioma in 1999. He and his wife sued Brown & Root and fourteen other defendants. Brown & Root had been the general contractor on plant renovations and additions from 1969 to 1971, using asbestos-containing fireproofing, insulation…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007 · in the opinion
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
of a general duty to exercise reasonable care in preventing foreseeable harm ... is fair and just." \[Olivo, supra at 402, quoting Hopkins v Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 NJ 426, 438; 625 A2d 1110 (1993) (emphasis added…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 8, 2007 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Pilkington N. AM. v. Indus. Comm. (2007)
…Marshall & Melhorn, LLC, Michael S. Scalzo and John A. Borell, Jr., for relator. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sandra E. Pinkerton, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)
…applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent with his or her assertion in a previous action, if…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion
Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)
…disease and its cause constitutes a new injury and the basis for a separate cause of action. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007 · in the opinion
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…was presumptively a part of furnace insulation during the 1960s and 1970s. He testified, "My experience and the general understanding is that while there may have been Marigold ceramics, other options available, as there are today…