No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

41 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)

    …all damages, economic and noneconomic. Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1197-1198 (Arena) held that Proposition 51 applies to strict liability asbestos cases under certain circumstances. Wilson v. John Crane…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)

    …Cal.App.4th 1409, 1415-1416 \[37 Cal.Rptr.2d 902\].) If there has been no exposure, there is no causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655, 33 Cal…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …sought, or otherwise discovered his illness or injuries, prior to Proposition 51's effective date of June 4, 1986." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 525, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …and Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178 (Arena)\[10\] are unavailing because their attempts to portray their products as too "technical" or "complicated" for application of the consumer expectations test…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)

    …1420-1421, 37 Cal. Rptr.2d 902), and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal.App.4th [\29] at pages 655-656, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702, resulted in nonsuits or directed verdicts that…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  10. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)

    …same\]; Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999) 230 Wis.2d 212, 601 N.W.2d 627, 636 \[same\]; but see Pustejovsky v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (Tex.App.1998) 980 S.W.2d 828, 831-833…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …DISCUSSION A. Personal Jurisdiction\[\\\\] B. Arena v. Owens-Corning In Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (Arena) (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580, Division One of this Court upheld a judgment…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Norris v. Crane Company (2008)

    …and reasonably foreseeable manner; or (2) whether the benefits of the challenged design outweigh the risk of danger inherent in the design. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …Cal.App.4th 847, 852-859, 97 Cal. Rptr.2d 240 (Wilson); Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 1197, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580.) Under Proposition 51, Crane is jointly…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …1986, section 1431.2 is the "heart" of Proposition 51, formally but less widely known as the Fair Responsibility Act of 1986. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 528, fn. 3…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …the date of the decedent's injury as a matter of law. Appellants cite the Supreme Court's opinion in Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The third…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …dangerous to place the product in the hands of a user without a suitable warning or if no warning is given. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1000 \[281 Cal.Rptr…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, [\1359] 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The…

  19. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …In some cases, there are no special rules for liability toward contractor's employees, and general negligence rules are applied. (Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (La.Ct.App. 2004) 878 So.2d 631, 639, fn…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)

    …negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…