No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    James Scribner, a Navy veteran who later worked for a power company, developed mesothelioma and died in November 1995. He had sued, and his widow and children continued the case, against John Crane, Garlock and others. Scribner testified that in the…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    …Me.1980) Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 16 (Miss. 1974); Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1301, 1301 (N.Y. 1995); Anderson v. Lilly & Co., 588 N.E.2d 66…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)

    …800 A.2d 722 (2002) (applying Balbos to an asbestos [\162] bystander); Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 526-30, 682 A.2d 1143 (1996) (same). Owens-Illinois's argument, more specifically stated…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    …Me.1980) Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 16 (Miss. 1974); Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1301, 1301 (N.Y. 1995); Anderson v. Lilly & Co., 588 N.E.2d 66…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois v. Gianotti (2002)

    …has not been, and could not have been, reasonably discovered prior to the marriage. In the case of Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 86 N.Y.2d 449, 634 N.Y.S.2d 18, 657 N…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …to move. For example, this fluid makes it easier for the lungs to move during breathing." See American Cancer Society at http://www.cancer.org. As we noted in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …1992). Thus, we are not privy to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)

    …to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …enough to establish joint tortfeasor status. Jacobs v. Flynn, 131 Md.App. 342, 374-75, 749 A.2d 174 (2000). See Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 531-32, 682 A.2d 1143 …

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Sledz v. Flintkote Co. (2002)

    …key question for courts regarding removal under § 1446(b) has been when an action commences [\562] for the purposes of the statute. Zumas v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 907 F.Supp. 131, 132 (D.Md.1995)…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Pransky (2002)

    …Inc., 283 Md. 296, 328, 389 A.2d 887, 906 (1978) (same); Owens-Corning v. Walatka, 125 Md.App. 313, 342, 725 A.2d 579, 593 (1999) (same). Because Lisa did not handle the joint compound…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Csr, Limited v. Taylor (2009)

    …their claims in Australia strikes me as the antithesis of "fair play and substantial justice." Chief Judge Bell and Judge Raker have authorized me to state that they join this dissenting opinion. \[1\] In Owens-Illinois…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005 · in the opinion

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)

    …4th 645, 689 (Cal. 1995) (holding that the continuous injury trigger of coverage should be applied to third party claims of continuous or progressively deteriorating bodily injury or property damage); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004

    Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)

    …asbestos insulation and products nearby. The circuit court granted summary judgment to BGE, reasoning that a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that several…