No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2006)

    …a review of damage awards made in other cases. In so doing, we find the closest case to this one is Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-248 (La.App. 1 Cir. 4/2/04)…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …the date of the decedent's injury as a matter of law. Appellants cite the Supreme Court's opinion in Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …that \[her\] contact with it was of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it." Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)

    …sophisticated user\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188-1189 \[bulk supplier defense does not apply to asbestos\].) These contentions were not raised during the trial. No jury instructions were…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 8, 2001

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …055. This opinion decided the appeals specific to his case; Owens Corning's part was stayed by its bankruptcy. The court held the jury was not clearly wrong to find Westinghouse's wallboard unreasonably dangerous, because…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)

    …and sewer pipe in Pittsburgh. He later worked at the Anchor Hocking glass plant, where he was exposed to asbestos cement used to repair glass-annealing ovens (lehrs), to pipe covering, and to transite mill board…

  10. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 27, 2005

    Holdampf v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig, 2005)

    …lost. Under New York law, an employer or landowner owes no duty of care to an employee's household member allegedly injured by asbestos dust brought home on work clothes, because no relationship between the defendant…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)

    …construction materials. Surface Combustion, Inc. provided glass ovens, termed lehrs at Anchor Hocking Glass Company. \[2\] Two other defendants listed on the verdict sheet settled, and are not involved in these appeals. \[3\] Mesothelioma, a cancer…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2009 · in the opinion

    Short v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc. (2009)

    …and accepted" doctrine, under which a builder or designer of a real property improvement owes no duty to a third party injured by a patent defect after the owner accepts the completed improvement. (See Jones v…