No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

27 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    …Me.1980) Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 16 (Miss. 1974); Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1301, 1301 (N.Y. 1995); Anderson v. Lilly & Co., 588 N.E.2d 66…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)

    …all damages, economic and noneconomic. Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1197-1198 (Arena) held that Proposition 51 applies to strict liability asbestos cases under certain circumstances. Wilson v. John Crane…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …App.3d at 461, 243 Ill.Dec. 579, 723 N.E.2d at 1182. In Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532, 659 N.E.2d 448 (1995…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 682 A…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …and any conflict in the evidence must be resolved in his favor."); see also, Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033, 1038-1039 (Pa.Super.2004) (holding that the jury was free…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion

    Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …184. An ability to try a case in an expeditious manner [\384] has also been recognized as a private- interest factor. Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532…

  9. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007 · in the opinion

    Asbestos Corporation Limited v. Akaiwa (2007)

    …motions. The court certified its orders for interlocutory appeal, which we accepted. DISCUSSION AND DECISION Standard of Review Our standard of review for summary judgment appeals is well established. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb, 754…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2006)

    …including the Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, alleging that the manufacturers were responsible for her husband's asbestos-exposure injuries and resulting death. Prior to trial, all defendants with the exception of Owens-Corning settled or were…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)

    …sophisticated user\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188-1189 \[bulk supplier defense does not apply to asbestos\].) These contentions were not raised during the trial. No jury instructions were…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 22, 2001 · in the opinion

    King v. Paul J. Krez Co. (2001)

    …the specific jobsites at issue. Thus, we find that Krueger is not applicable. We also find that the Fourth District's opinion in Boldini v. Owens Corning, 318 Ill.App.3d 1167, 253 Ill.Dec. 88…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Pransky (2002)

    …Inc., 283 Md. 296, 328, 389 A.2d 887, 906 (1978) (same); Owens-Corning v. Walatka, 125 Md.App. 313, 342, 725 A.2d 579, 593 (1999) (same). Because Lisa did not handle the joint compound…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 13, 2004 · in the opinion

    Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (2004)

    …Super 31 OSCAR L. SMALLS AND LIZZIE SMALLS, Appellees v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP.; GREENE TWEED & CO., INC.; A.W.CHESTERTON, INC., QUIGLEY CO., INC., PFIZER, INC.; GAF CORP.; RUBBERROID CO., INC.; OWENS ILLINOIS, INC.; FLEXITALLIC GASKET…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion

    Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)

    …A Lite 0% CertainTeed Corp. 5% Pipe Covering/Block Insulation Armstrong, Inc. 0% Owens-Illinois 0% Pittsburg Corning 0% Johns Manville 20% JT Thorpe and Son, Inc. 0% Metalclad Insulation Corp. 0% Refractiories/Castables AP Green…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003

    Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)

    R.D. Hughes and his wife Letha sued Olin Corporation and other companies over his occupational exposure to asbestos. Hughes had been diagnosed with asbestosis in 1990 and had joined earlier class-action suits, keeping the right to sue if he later…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…