9 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003
Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)
R.D. Hughes and his wife Letha sued Olin Corporation and other companies over his occupational exposure to asbestos. Hughes had been diagnosed with asbestosis in 1990 and had joined earlier class-action suits, keeping the right to sue if he later…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion
Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)
…the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion
Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)
…App.3d at 461, 243 Ill.Dec. 579, 723 N.E.2d at 1182. In Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532, 659 N.E.2d 448 (1995…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2006)
…gaskets. In evaluating liability in an asbestos case, traditional tort liability theories, including negligence, apply and require proof of causation. Emery v. Owens-Corp., 2000-2144, p. 12 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/9/01), 813…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion
Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)
…and any conflict in the evidence must be resolved in his favor."); see also, Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033, 1038-1039 (Pa.Super.2004) (holding that the jury was free…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)
…owned by defendant Unocal Corporation, that term is used to refer to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe. (See Alcaraz v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)
…negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion
Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)
…Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […