No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

36 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003

    Chavers v. Gatke Corp. (2003)

    …trial record also showed asbestos exposure during Navy service from 1958 to 1962. All defendants but Gatke Corporation and Owens-Illinois settled before trial. The plaintiffs admitted they had no evidence he used or worked around…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 27, 2004

    Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries (2004)

    …trial court's ruling that Cichirillo's claim against Northrop Grumman (Avondale), Flintkote, Territo, Owens-Illinois, Uniroyal, Hopeman Brothers and Charles Johnson was prescribed, and remanded the case for further proceedings. A timely suit in a…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 19, 2000 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Crown Cork & Seal (2000)

    …Corp. Sharon Jeanne Glover, LeClair Ryan, Richmond, VA, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corp. Robert L. O'Donnell, Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, Norfolk, VA, for Owens-Illinois, Inc. Carl Robert Schwertz, Duane & Shannon, P.C., Richmond…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …He sued, claiming that the disease resulted from his exposure to the defendant's products during the period of [\736] 1962-63. Owens-Illinois, advancing the "manifestation" theory, argued that Armstrong's cause of action did…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · October 22, 2009 · in the opinion

    Stephens v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Products, LLC, f/k/a Barton Instrument Systems, LLC; John Crane, Inc.; Leslie Controls, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Marley Co., Division of Weil McLain United Dominion; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Packing & Insulations Corp.; Peerless Industries, Inc.…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2003 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. John Crane, Inc. (2003)

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 103, 928 P.2d 1181 (Richards) that controls here. In Richards, the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the interplay between Proposition 51 and…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Norris v. Crane Company (2008)

    …Indeed, both parties assumed that quite complicated design considerations were at issue, and that expert testimony was necessary to illuminate these matters." (Ibid.) In Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra, 32 Cal.App.4th at page…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …economic loss are matters entrusted to the wide discretion of the trial judge. In terms of the width, the virtually boundless width, of "wide discretion," as recently as 1992 Owens-Illinois v. Zenobia, 325 Md. 420…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …a preponderance of the evidence that in reasonable medical probability, this exposure was a substantial factor contributing to \[Cadlo's\] risk of developing the disease." "Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …the plaintiff's favor, rejecting John Crane's argument that the consumer expectation test was inapplicable because expert witnesses were required. (See also Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 465 \[38…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Wright v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …Corp., Goulds Pumps, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Nosroc Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pars Manufacturing Co., Pecora Corp., Pep Boys, Rapid American Corp., Riley Stoker Corp., Selby Battersby, Union…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …plaintiffs failed to establish its products caused Cunningham's mesothelioma. We disagree. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling two-part test for determining whether exposure to asbestos…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …Arena court for extending the holdings of Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 38 Cal. Rptr.2d 739 and Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1529…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 4, 2008 · in the opinion

    Holliday v. Warren Pumps LLC (2008)

    …to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease suffered by him, pursuant to the standard of proof articulated in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion

    Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)

    …Houston, TX, for North American Refractories Co., defendant. Randolph L Burns, Baker & Botts, Dallas, TX, for Owens-Illinois, Inc., defendant. Thomas F Dougall, Bowers Orr et al, Columbia, SC, for Proko Industries, defendant. Robert H Bass…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Walmach v. Wheeler (2009)

    …At the most fundamental level, there is scientific uncertainty regarding the biological mechanisms by which inhalation of certain microscopic fibers of asbestos leads to lung cancer and mesothelioma." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weber v. John Crane, Inc. (2006)

    …the defendant with enough frequency and regularity as to show a reasonable medical probability that this exposure was a factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …new 2003). We have reviewed the instructions given to the jury and conclude that there was no error. Our Supreme Court addressed the issue of causation in asbestos cases in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. Thorpe Insulation Company (2009)

    …. inhaled or ingested, and hence to the risk of developing asbestos-related cancer. . . ." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977, fn. omitted.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather the…