No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

3 results for “Reaction Department”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 16, 2003

    Matter of O'malley v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York (2003)

    …Third Department, reversed. It noted that nobody disputed the roughly 25 years of asbestos exposure at work. Gould relied on that exposure and on features in the medical records, including a tissue reaction in the biopsy…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …trial by video deposition because he was too ill to travel. The record established that Clemmer had recently undergone a long course of chemotherapy and had suffered a severe allergic reaction. At the time of trial…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …Riegel even beyond the claimed date of 1977. The judge did not allow redaction of the sales strategy information because "there's an inference to be made from that, that they were pushing the asbestos felt…