9 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)
…to by Dr. Cantor, was Union Carbide's post-CCR experience whereby it saw its total indemnity costs go from $39 million in 2001 to $155 million in 2002, $293 million in 2003, and eventually $300…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)
…Cantor considered in her side-by side comparisons, she failed to fully appreciate the Union Carbide experience, which more closely resembled T & N's experience as it left the CCR at the same time as T…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 14, 2006 · in the opinion
In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2006)
…stopped settling claims collectively, effective February 1, 2001. U.S. Gypsum, Union Car bide, T & N, Quigley, and GAF all experienced an increase in settlement amounts post-CCR. 5/23/06 AM Tr. 55-57 (Myer…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009
Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)
Viking Pump and Warren Pumps bought pump businesses from Houdaille Industries and now face asbestos injury claims from the years Houdaille owned those businesses. They sued twenty excess insurers, who had sold Houdaille forty-five policies, to use…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · May 9, 2006 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation (2006)
…the largest cohort ever studied of asbestos exposed people is? A. The asbestos insulators, members of the heat and frost insulators union. Q. And how many people have been in that cohort? A. 17,800. Q…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · January 30, 2004 · in the opinion
Roca v. EI du Pont de Nemours and Co. (2004)
…761 F.2d 1068, 1073-74 (5th Cir.1985). \[15\] Cannon v. Teamsters and Chauffeurs Union, 657 F.2d 173, 177-78 (7th Cir.1981) (issue raised by appellant at oral argument had been waived because…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
Debtors") are Carter Automotive Company, Inc., Federal-Mogul Corporation, Federal-Mogul Dutch Holdings Inc., Federal-Mogul FX, Inc., Federal-Mogul Global Inc., Federal-Mogul Global Properties, Inc., Federal-Mogul Ignition Company, Federal-Mogul Machine Tool, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Grossman's, Inc. (2009)
…744 F.2d 332 (3d Cir. 1984). \[2\] Schweitzer, 758 F.2d 936 (3d Cir. 1985). \[3\] See Am. Flint Glass Workers Union v. Anchor Resolution Corp., 197 F.3d 76, 80 (3d Cir. 1999). \[4…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion
Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston (2005)
…for example, plaintiffs could sue in Texas even though they themselves resided elsewhere, and had never been exposed to asbestos products in Texas. Mass-Screenings Labor unions, attorneys, and other persons with suspect motives caused large…