No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · February 11, 2004

    Conwed Corporation v. Union Carbide Corporation (2004)

    The court granted Conwed's motion (treated as one for summary judgment) and dismissed with prejudice Union Carbide's counterclaim for contribution to its Naig settlements with Conwed's former employees. Under Minnesota law, an employer…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · September 8, 2003

    Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp. (2003)

    The district court denied Union Carbide's renewed motion for summary judgment on bulk supplier/sophisticated user grounds, leaving Conwed's subrogation claim against Union Carbide to proceed. Under Minnesota law, a supplier's reliance on…

  3. Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · October 4, 2001

    Conwed v. Union Carbide Chem. and Plastics (2001)

    …but not for employees without manifested disease or without a present duty to pay; it also held that Conwed may seek prejudgment interest from Union Carbide. An employer's third-party subrogation claim under Minn. Stat…

  4. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion

    Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)

    …Minn. Jan. 27, 1992), overruled on other grounds by Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chems. & Plastics Co., 634 N.W.2d 401, 414 (Minn. 2001) (declining to adopt the Hahn opinion's interpretation of Minn. Stat…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …legal or financial effect on the objector after confirmation.\[50\] Unfortunately for this argument, the Supreme Court held in Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 530 U.S. 1, 120 S.Ct…