24 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018
Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied jurisdictional discovery. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over corporations not incorporated or headquartered in New York, and lacked specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, ruling against plaintiffs English and Raso. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over New Jersey-incorporated, New Jersey-headquartered defendants…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…and makes Volkswagen vehicles, asked to be dismissed because Washington courts lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The court found no general jurisdiction, since Volkswagen AG is neither incorporated nor based in Washington. It also found no…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2018
Germain v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…The court found the defendants had made an initial showing, but the plaintiffs' experts raised fact issues on general and specific causation. It noted that conflicting expert evidence and credibility questions must be resolved by a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…in California, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed that it was not subject to general jurisdiction in Washington because it was not incorporated or headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found no general jurisdiction because the company was not at home in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction because the plaintiffs did not allege that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…own internal documents, so the statements were misleading when made. Opinion statements are actionable only if not honestly believed or lacking a reasonable basis, and general value statements are non-actionable puffery. Trial Procedure and Discovery
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…where the plaintiff's exposure occurred in Toronto. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendant was not at home in Washington. Personal Jurisdiction Worksites: Toronto worked with brakes and clutches on Volkswagen vehicles Toronto 1986-1994
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2018
Stevenson v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2018)
…in part that the Florida federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The plaintiff conceded there was no general jurisdiction and argued for specific jurisdiction. She relied on the predecessor's Florida business registration and registered…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…employees or agents in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that WCD sold talc to Johnson & Johnson for nationwide distribution in cosmetic products. The court found no general jurisdiction, which the plaintiffs did not dispute. On specific jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 23, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…in Ohio, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed. It found no general jurisdiction, because Dana Companies is neither incorporated nor headquartered in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction either. The…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 21, 2019
Hernandez v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing that its product could not have contributed to the illness, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 16, 2019
Youse & Youse v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…is a citizen of the forum state. Under Bane, registration to do business in Pennsylvania is sufficient for general personal jurisdiction, absent Third Circuit or Supreme Court direction to the contrary after Daimler. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
… 12-15) Thus, none of these Defendants are subject to general jurisdiction in Alabama. \[4\] Plaintiff also takes issue with Downey's reliance on a summary of sales records he was given prior to his deposition…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Huff v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2019)
…307, 310 (1999): The general rule of corporate-successor liability is that when a company sells its assets to another company, the acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the selling company…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Oklahoma · June 21, 2019 · in the opinion
In re Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)
…One problem with this argument is that while J & J makes general statements that the indemnification agreements and shared policies are applicable it has not produced any admissible evidence pointing to specific language in the indemnification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Slonim v. J & R Film Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…are directed to serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on the Trial Support Clerk in the General Clerk's Office (room 119) and the County Clerk (room 141b) who are directed to…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Hardman v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…the remaining parties in this action, the County Clerk, and the Trial Support Clerk in the General Clerk's Office who shall mark their records accordingly, and it is further, ORDERED, that Bristol-Myers Squibb Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…limiting products liability actions against nonmanufacturing sellers. Section 82.003 established a general rule that a nonmanufacturing seller is not liable for harm caused by a defective product. This limitation was enacted to protect "innocent sellers…