No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 15, 2019

    Fullen v. 3M Company (2019)

    Richard Fullen, an Air Force aircraft mechanic from 1994 to 2016, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in May 2016. He and his wife Michelle sued several companies that made or sold asbestos-containing products he encountered, alleging negligence, strict…

  2. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 5, 2018

    Turcotte v. 3M Company (2018)

    Gerard Turcotte and his wife sued 3M Company and about 120 other defendants in Rhode Island Superior Court. They alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products, mostly through work as an electrician and through improvements to…

  3. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · January 5, 2010 · in the opinion

    Downs v. 3M Company (2010)

    …Trailmobile, Trane US Inc. f/k/a American Standard Inc., Transtar, United Gilsonite Laboratories, Union Carbide Corporation, Volkswagen Group of America Inc., Warner Electric, Wichita Clutch, Wilson Trailer Co. Other Defendants later joined in the motion…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 29, 2018 · in the opinion

    Leech v. 3M Company (2018)

    …Elam, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC, Margaret Adams Casey, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC & Martin James Dempsey, Jr., Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC. Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by McGready Lewis Richeson, Pugh, Accardo, Haas, Radecker & Carey, Francis Xavier…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · March 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    Dugas v. 3M Company (2016)

    …present evidence that a reasonable alternative design existed and argue whether the benefit of the product's design outweighed any risks of injury or death caused by the design." Aubin v. Union Carbide Corp., 177 So…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Boyd v. Super. CT. OF Alameda County (2014)

    …this is a mandatory preference. (See Landry v. Berryessa Union School Dist. (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 691, 696-697.)\[2\] There is no question that Boyd is over 70 years old and has a substantial…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Haas v. 3M Company (2014)

    …Salerno, 937 F.2d 797, 806 (2d Cir. 1991)); see also Creamer v. Gen. Teamsters Local Union 326, 560 F. Supp. 495, 498-99 (D. Del. 1983) ("In order for testimony to be admissible under Rule…