13 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (2018)
…11) (emphasis in original). Hopeman then explains that, in light of Appalachian Insurance Co. v. General Electric Co., 8 N.Y.3d 162, 831 N.Y.S.2d 742, 863 N.E.2d 994, 999 (2007)…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · June 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Penn. Gen. Ins. v. Park-Ohio Ind. (2010)
126 Ohio St.3d 98 (2010) 2010-Ohio-2745 930 N.E.2d 800 PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 2009-0104. Submitted December 2, 2009…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)
…in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018
Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)
…in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)
…and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)
…8.3 of the Plan and Continental had to respond, so the Trustee prevailed. A chapter 11 plan is a contract interpreted under general contract rules (here Illinois law). The plan's term "allocated percentage" has…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Continental Casualty v. Chatz for Cfb/wfb Trust (2018)
…from gaining an advantage by taking inconsistent positions, but also because of general considerations of the orderly administration of justice and regard for the dignity of judicial proceedings, and to protect against a litigant playing fast…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 15, 2017 · in the opinion
In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2017)
…The Trustee has accepted this proposition.\[22\] According to the Illinois Supreme Court: The general rule is that where a person by his or her statements and conduct leads a party to do something that the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)
…alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)
…"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…