8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 6, 2019
Rothlein v. Imerys Talc America (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…of the remaining claims against Imerys, so the plaintiffs kept those claims. General jurisdiction over a corporation exists only where it is incorporated or has its principal place of business. A corporation that buys another's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
… 12-15) Thus, none of these Defendants are subject to general jurisdiction in Alabama. \[4\] Plaintiff also takes issue with Downey's reliance on a summary of sales records he was given prior to his deposition…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Huff v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2019)
…307, 310 (1999): The general rule of corporate-successor liability is that when a company sells its assets to another company, the acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the selling company…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 3, 2018 · in the opinion
Cohen v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…451 NE2d 195 \[1983\]). There are four exceptions to New York's general rule on successor liability, as the successor may be "held liable for the torts of its predecessor if (1) it expressly or impliedly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Peralta v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…to form CAMC. CAMC moved to dismiss for lack of general or specific personal jurisdiction. This Court held that general jurisdiction could not be exercised over CAMC because it was not incorporated nor had its principal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2018 · in the opinion
Bell v. American International Industries (2018)
…DENIED. \[1\] Neither party has addressed whether res judicata might apply in this case. "\[A\]s a general matter, a district court should not sua sponte consider an affirmative defense that the defendant has the burden…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion
LaFLAIR v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…thus requiring the Court to interpret each allegation as against Kolmar individually. While these "general allegation\[s\] would arguably be insufficient under federal pleading standards, the question at this stage is whether Plaintiff\['s\] pleadings are…