No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 3, 2014

    Whalen v. General Electric Corporation (2014)

    The court denied General Dynamics' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' strict products liability claim and denied its motion to strike the punitive damages prayer as moot, so the Whalens' claims proceeded. Under maritime law, a complaint…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · August 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Lund v. 3M Company (2016)

    …district court case, Defendants argued that a Navy ship should not be considered a "product" for purposes of a strict liability claim. (Id. (citing Mack v. General Electric Co., 896 F. Supp. 2d 333, 345 (E…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gottschall v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …Johnson court's explicit approval of the reasoning of the federal court in In re Related Asbestos Cases. \[Johnson, supra,\] 43 Cal.4th at 69-70." (Gottschall v. General Electric (E.D.Pa., Dec. 9, 2011…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 21, 2016

    Brinkman v. General Dynamics Corporation (2016)

    …defense is available in failure-to-warn cases; this favored General Dynamics and Electric Boat over the Brinkmans. The government contractor defense is available in failure-to-warn cases, so a district court may not remand…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 26, 2016

    Boyd v. Boeing Company (2016)

    The court denied Lockheed Martin's and General Dynamics' motions to reconsider the order allowing plaintiffs to add them as defendants after the amendment deadline, and denied their motion to strike them from the amended complaint…