20 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
The Court of Special Appeals vacated the judgments for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company and remanded for a new trial, because the trial court should not have admitted the plaintiffs' expert's causation opinion…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
…the intermediate appellate court, reinstated the jury verdicts for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company, and reversed the trial court's judgment for Ford on its cross-claim against Georgia-Pacific, which won back the…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 7, 2017
Heaton v. Ford Motor Co. (2017)
Paul Heaton, as executor of the estate of Robert Brawley, sued several companies, including McCord Corporation, alleging that Brawley's mesothelioma and death resulted from asbestos exposure. Against McCord, he claimed Brawley was exposed while repairing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Ford, Brenntag Specialties, Whittaker Clark & Daniels and Honeywell because Ratcliff's claims were time-barred, and recommended terminating the other pending motions as moot. Under North Carolina law…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 3, 2017
Hayden v. 3M Co. (2017)
Thomas Hayden and his wife Jacqueline sued 3M Company and other corporations in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, in a case involving Mr. Hayden's mesothelioma. The opinion does not describe his work or exposure. Before trial, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · May 28, 2015
Hayes v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2015)
The court granted summary judgment to Honeywell (successor to Bendix) and Ford, dismissing plaintiffs' claims against them with prejudice for lack of product identification evidence. Under the Louisiana Products Liability Act, product identification is a threshold…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · May 28, 2015
Hayes v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2015)
The court granted summary judgment for Honeywell (successor to Bendix) and Ford, dismissing with prejudice the Hayes sons' claims over their father's mesothelioma death. Under the Louisiana Products Liability Act, a manufacturer is liable only…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017
Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)
…warn claims, but denied it to Honeywell and Ford on the brake design defect claim, so the plaintiffs' case continued against those two; Ford's sanctions motion was denied. Under Ohio's Product Liability Act, a…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 11, 2012
Gaskill v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…Honeywell, Volkswagen and Ford prevailed. Dismissal with prejudice is a permissible sanction where a party commits fraud on the court by deliberately lying about his work history in discovery and no lesser sanction would suffice. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)
…Scientific Corp., 252 F.3d 1253, 1255 (11th Cir. 2001) (quoting McCants v. Ford Motor Co., 781 F.2d 855, 856-57 (11th Cir. 1986) (emphasis in McCants). The critical question is whether dismissal would cause…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 16, 2015 · in the opinion
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2015)
…g., Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 562 F.3d 553, 557 (3d Cir. 2009) ("We have long held that an injury measured in solely monetary terms cannot constitute irreparable harm."). On its face…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2016)
…Cleveland, OH, for Ford Motor Co. General Electric Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Cleveland, OH, for General Electric Corporation. Genuine Parts Company c/o Grant Norris SA, Columbus, OH, for Genuine Parts Company. Pneumo Abex Corp. Successor…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion
Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
…309 Wis. 2d 541, 556, 749 N.W.2d 581, 589 (negligence); Austin v. Ford Motor Co., 86 Wis. 2d 628, 643, 273 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1979) (strict liability). The comparison to be made…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 29, 2011
Corley v. Bill Vann Co. (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)
The executor of Charles Corley's estate sued a group of companies in Alabama state court under the Alabama Wrongful Death Act. Mr. Corley had died of mesothelioma in October 2009. The case was removed to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion
Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)
…D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), reconsidered on other grounds sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (Dec. 17, 2015).\[2\] Even if Ms. Smith could show…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion
Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)
…806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
…evidence." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 543 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\], italics omitted, overruled on different grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…S. 592-94. After considering these factors, courts are granted a "broad attitude" to determine admissibility. Clay v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 663, 667 (6th Cir. 2000). Admissibility does not require a perfect methodology…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Defendant, represented by Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C. & Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C.. Ingersoll Rand Company, Defendant, represented by Jessica Lee Tyler…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion
Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)
…Brake Shoe and Foundry Company (Abex's predecessor) (Rodarmel, 2011 IL App (4th) 100463, ¶ 13, 957 N.E.2d 107); (4) from 1959 through 1963, John D. Biggers, chairman of the Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Company…