8 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Williams v. Placid Oil Company (2017)
…Rubber & Gasket settled with Plaintiffs does not meet Ingersoll-Rand's burden of proof As noted by the trial court, the appellate court in Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-248, p.14 (La.App…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Walker v. Blackmer Pump Co. (2019)
…Owens testified that Decedent probably worked on every electrical system on the U.S.S. Plymouth Rock. Further, Mr. Owens stated that Decedent spent roughly fifty-percent of his two-years aboard the U.S.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…nder maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute."), with Quirin v…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…jurisdiction over WCD in Illinois, because WCD is a New Jersey corporation with a Connecticut principal place of business, WCD owns no property in Illinois, WCD has no offices in Illinois, WCD has no employees in…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)
…Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wash.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wash.2d at 787, 108 P.3d 1220…