No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 26, 2012

    Brannan v. Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust (2012)

    The personal representatives of four deceased men (Brannan, McFadden, Nardone and Jakubowski) had each won asbestos verdicts in Baltimore City between 1996 and 2001. All four died of mesothelioma. Three had been steelworkers at Bethlehem Steel…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …Owens-Corning's Distribution of Kaylo Manufactured By Owens-Illinois, Followed By Owens-Corning's Purchase of the Kaylo Division ¶ 53 In 1943, Owens-Illinois began operating the pilot plant to manufacture Kaylo. $2,849,000…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Leonard v. John Crane, Inc. (2012)

    …decades can pass between the first asbestos exposure and development of cancerous mesothelioma tumors. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 \[66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71\] (Buttram).)\[5…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …No. 4 does not adequately convey the concept of concurrent causation and the trial court properly declined to accept it as part of the jury instruction. See Skonberg v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 215 Ill. App…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …later diagnosis of a distinct malignant asbestos-related condition. The diagnosis of a malignant asbestos-related condition creates a new cause of action." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Wis…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …identify "a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433A(1) (1965); see Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · August 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …a second tortfeasor's actions must \be an independent force which entirely supersedes the original action and renders its effect in the chain of causation remote.'" Jackson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 62 F.3d 1414…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …determination. It is noted, that in New York, injury occurs when plaintiff is exposed to asbestos. (see Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 (1997); Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litig. \[Chrabas\], 273…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (causation in asbestos case requires "evidence of exposure to a specific product ... in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked"); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …a verdict in favor of that party. \[Citations.\]" (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) The trial court's ruling is reviewed de novo. (Brassinga v…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 21, 2015

    Kochera v. General Electric Company (2015)

    The district court denied General Electric's motion in limine, joined by Owens-Illinois and John Crane, to exclude plaintiff Kochera's medical expert Dr. Vuskovich, so the plaintiff won the ruling. A physician board certified…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010

    Crane v. Linkus (2010)

    George Linkus, a Baltimore shipyard machinist, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in 2005 and sued John Crane, Inc. and others. He had worked at the Key Highway shipyard from 1952 to 1959, overhauling valves and packing them with dry, powdery…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013

    Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)

    James Joyner, a 22-year Coast Guard veteran who had earlier worked as an electrician's assistant at the Charleston Navy Shipyard, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in March 2012. He sued several asbestos product makers and others in Baltimore…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)

    …defective designs of the other companies' products were legal causes of the plaintiffs' injuries; and the percentage of legal cause attributable to the other companies." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …Id. Rather than find that the duty to warn extended by way of an intermediary, the Court instead required a relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. Cf. Adams v. Owens-Illinois, 119 Md. App. 395, 411…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …whether a union pension or otherwise; and (c) life insurance proceeds. CBS concedes that this evidence is barred by the collateral source rule, unless the plaintiff opens the door for impeachment purposes. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.…

  18. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …jurisdiction over WCD in Illinois, because WCD is a New Jersey corporation with a Connecticut principal place of business, WCD owns no property in Illinois, WCD has no offices in Illinois, WCD has no employees in…