Search

• Decade: 2010s ×
• Organization: Lamorak Insurance Company ×
• Clear filters

7 results for “General Electric”

1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion

   Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)

   …Taylor, Wellons, Politz & Duhe, APLC. CBS Corporation, successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC & General Electric Company, Cross Defendants, represented by John Joseph Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · June 21, 2017 · in the opinion

   Morgan v. Dow Chemical Company (2017)

   …Jr., Frilot, Partridge, LC, Kelsey Anne Eagan, Frilot L.L.C. & Magali Ann Puente-Martin, Frilot LLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by John J. Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M. Bowlin, Frilot L…

3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 31, 2019 · in the opinion

   Knight v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2019)

   …and Nordstrom Valves, Inc., Defendant, represented by Stacey Leigh Strain, Hubbard, Mitchell, Williams & Strain, PLLC. General Electric Company, Lincoln Electric Company, Mueller Co. LLC, Trane US, Inc., formerly known as American Standard, Inc., Sterling Fluid Systems…

4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 4, 2017 · in the opinion

   Templet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2017)

   … refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[111\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be "strictly construed in favor of remand," the federal officer removal statute's language must be liberally interpreted.\[112…

5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion

   Parfait v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2019)

   …Co., 149 F.3d 387, 397 (5th Cir. 1998). Another feature distinguishing the federal officer removal statute from the general removal statute is that, unlike § 1441(a),\[6\] § 1442(a) must be liberally construed. See Watson…

6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion

   Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)

   …The agent stated that Lamorak was "binding the primary general liability program using the \ \ \ SIR." The document supports the [\141] inference that the agent and Kone believed Lamorak had agreed to issue primary insurance subject to…

7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 2019 · in the opinion

   Courville v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2019)

   …In Long, the plaintiff named defendant, Eagle Asbestos & Packing Company, Inc. ("Eagle") and one of its commercial general liability (CGL) insurers, OneBeacon, as defendants. OneBeacon brought a third-party claim against another CGL insurer, United States…