No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 2013

    Ambruso v. Goulds Pumps (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2013)

    …D. Roosevelt electrical engineer 1950s-1980s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1940s; shipfitter and seaman in the United States Navy USS Chicago 1940s; insulator 1950s-1990s; general laborer, bus…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion

    Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)

    …The 13 defendants remaining in his action are: American Biltrite, Inc., Burnham, CBS Corp., Conwed Corp., Domco Products Texas, Inc., General Electric Company, Genuine Parts Company, Georgia-Pacific, Grinnell, Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Mannington Mills, Inc.…

  3. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)

    …Texas, L.P.; Draco Mechanical Supply, Inc.; Duro Dyne Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; General Gasket Corporation; General Refractories Co.; Georgia Pacific Corporation; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; Homasote Company; Honeywell International, Inc.…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138.) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to the issues presented by…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas · December 21, 2018

    Thomas v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)

    …old brakes, since Arkansas has not adopted market share liability. All other claims survived. The court found factual disputes over general causation, frequency of exposure, design defect and the adequacy of Honeywell's warnings. It applied…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019

    Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)

    …cigarettes a day for about 37 years. Honda moved for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not prove general or specific causation. Several other defendants asked the court to bar plaintiff's medical experts and, if successful…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014

    Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …not make clear which defendants were sued in which counts, the court dismissed it without prejudice and ordered an amended complaint by May 9, 2014. It also noted general personal jurisdiction standards for a later motion.

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · May 23, 2012 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    He did not question the pathologist's opinion in terms of general causation, but he expressed circumspection concerning how that opinion translated to substantial-factor causation. See N.T., Aug. 17, 2005, at 105. For example…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)

    …found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …reasonable probability that in the absence of the error, a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) "It is well settled…

  11. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Leathers v. Pneumo Abex (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in Rhode Island.\[1\] The Court noted that "this test comports with \[their\] Supreme Court's general causation jurisprudence and fairly balances the interests of plaintiffs and defendants."\[2\] The Sweredoski decision is a 2013 decision…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …401 F.3d at 1242. The four criteria are as follows: (1) has the toxic substance in question been demonstrated to cause the type of illness or disease in question (general causation), (2) was the individual…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2012)

    …1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510\] (Weeks).) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2018)

    …affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. General Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lacey, 199…