9 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016
George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)
…2013, a copy of which is available on the court's website, http://www.ded.uscourts.gov. \[1\] CBS Corporation is sued as a successor-in-interest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse"). (D.1. 147 at…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018
Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)
…Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Rogers (2017)
…In 1980, Goodyear sampled materials. In 1983, Goodyear took six samples from maintenance electricians. Over half of the total samples were taken in 1985, after asbestos abatement efforts had begun. Goodyear trained its employee Ray Jackson…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 23, 2013
McCloskey v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2013)
…cut and punched gaskets from sheets stamped "Goodyear", which created dust, and that he believed they contained asbestos because he was told so and it was general knowledge. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada, Inc…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan, Inc. (2019)
51, 51-52 (2008) ("Beyond general and specific causation, an additional causation issue arises when multiple defendants are responsible for exposing the plaintiff to a harmful substance. The most common example is a plaintiff who contracts…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Blakely v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2019)
…Rubber & Supply Co., 117 Ohio App. 12 (7th Dist.1961). {¶31} "\[W\]hen the Ohio General Assembly enacted the current version of the \[Ohio Products Liability Act, R.C. 2307.71 et seq.\], it abrogated all…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…that relief from a judgment or order may be granted under certain limited circumstances, including where there is "excusable neglect." As a general proposition, the party seeking relief under Rule 60(b) must establish that: 1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Thrash v. Cirrus Enterprises, LLC (2017)
…749 F.3d 1117, 1122 (9th Cir. 2014) ("We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute\[.\]"); Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp…