No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

389 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 11 of 20

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …See Schultz, 721 F.3d at 432 (recognizing that such broad opinions give rise to concerns about "an ill-defined floor"); see also Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2:08-cv-630, 2013 WL 214378…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · August 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schneider Electric USA, Inc. v. Williams (2019)

    …raise direct and indirect exposure allegations.\[5\] However, unverified complaints "are not generally regarded as competent evidence of an admission or confession against the party on whose behalf such pleadings are drafted." Ford Motor Co. v…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 4, 2015 · in the opinion

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)

    …because science has failed to establish that any specific dosage of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …plaintiff's exposure. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 2016 WL 6876490, at [\8] (Pa. Nov. 22, 2016) (permitting expert opinion that "Rost's exposures to asbestos at Smith Motors were sufficiently frequent, regular, and proximate…

  5. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)

    …exposed to asbestos-containing products from the following nonparty defendants: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; A.W. Chesterton Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Honeywell International, Inc., f/k/a Allied Signal, as successor in interest to Allied Corp.…

  6. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

    …materials. Neither the Havers' nor Kesner's suit reached a jury. Abex moved for nonsuit at the beginning of trial in light of Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15, 34 (Campbell)…

  7. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 19, 2012 · in the opinion

    Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc. (2012)

    …Montgomery, 331 S.W.3d at 335. "Whether the plaintiff made a submissible case is a question of law subject to de novo review." Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 332 S.W.3d 749, 756 (Mo…

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2016)

    …was a negligence case). And in any event, the Louisiana Supreme Court's more recent decision almost two decades later in Dupree is binding on this court. See Ford Motor Co. v. Dall. Power & Light Co…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …602 F.3d 152, 172 (3d Cir. April 7, 2010) (quoting Pineda v. Ford Motor Co., 502 F.3d 237, 243-44 (3d Cir. 2008)). As is the case with regard to the Federal Rules of…

  12. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion

    McKenzie v. AW Chesterson Co. (2016)

    …P.2d 957 (1997), rev'd on other grounds, 330 Or. 376, 8 P.3d 200 (2000); see also Wood v. Ford Motor Co., 71 Or.App. 87, 90, 691 P.2d 495 (1984), rev. den.…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …b)(2); Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 189 F.3d 971, 981 n.18 (9th Cir. 1999). A Rule 12(c) motion challenges the sufficiency of the opposing party's pleadings, and the court…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)

    …be proper under § 1441(a) even if venue might have been improper in the state court prior to removal. Id.; see also Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 25, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)

    …SYSTEMS/LORAL, Cross Claimant, represented by MICHAEL DAVID SMITH, GLAZIER YEE LLP & WILLIAM R. ADAMS, DICKIE MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE. FORD MOTOR CO., Cross Claimant, represented by DANIEL J. SINCLAIR, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC & ERIC L. HORNE…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …87 Cal.App.4th 953, 980.) The case law makes clear that "\[t\]o accomplish this purpose, the award must be assessed against the party actually responsible for the wrong." (Ford Motor Co. v. Home Ins…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …Cal.App.4th 655, 690-691 \[71 Cal.Rptr.3d 775\].) As our Supreme Court stated in Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191 \[29 Cal.Rptr.3d 401, 113 P.3d 82…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)

    …strict liability analysis. Common sense tells us that the pumps were what Respondents sold to the Navy, and the gaskets and packing are included within that product. We have studied Ford Motor Co. v. Wood and…

  20. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)

    …v Frank Hrubetz & Co., 261 Md 141, 146-149, 274 A2d 107, 110-112 \[1971\]; Tibbetts v Ford Motor Co., 4 Mass App Ct 738, 741, 358 NE2d 460, 461-462 \[1976\]; see also Restatement \[Third…