226 results for “Reaction Department”, page 12 of 12
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Steiner v. Hollingsworth & Vose Company (2018)
…is asked to assert jurisdiction). \[3\] Plaintiff does not explain the details of this log, but redaction of the claimants' names would be anticipated. \[4\] See supra at note 3. \[5\] We note that the trial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…California. Doc. 210-5 at 17-19, 28.\[2\] These records were partially redacted, and the precise extent of the redaction is somewhat unclear. Doc. 210-5 at 17. Outside of these partially-redacted records, which…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Reed (2016)
…to depose anyone but herself, wants to preserve only her own testimony about her personal and unique knowledge of her employment involving direct contact with asbestos, her reactions to it, and her medical treatment, in sum…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)
…allergic reactions\]\]. To establish this claim, \[name of plaintiff\] must prove all of the following: \[¶\] 1. That \[name of defendant\] \[manufactured/distributed/sold\] the \[product\]; \[¶\] 2. That the \[product\] had potential \[risks/side effects/allergic reactions…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)
…throat as well.... He went on to answer the following question about both asbestos and tobacco smoke: Q. Do the larynx and the oropharynx have the same reactions to carcinogens? A. Can they both become cancerous…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)
…excessive cigarette smoking, heart disease, obesity, asthma, emphysema and allergic reactions. 1171 Id., at 687 n. 2. The condition the majority herein describes as compensable injury is "shortness of breath." Majority Op., at 1164. Despite Simmons…