584 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 13 of 30
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…defendant "\on a regular basis, over some extended period of time, in proximity to where the \[plaintiff\] actually worked'" (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (emphasis omitted…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)
…Paper Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Selby, Battersby & Co.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Waco Insulation, Inc.; Garlock, Inc.; and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. ECF No. 1-1. \[3\] See also Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)
…evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Mannahan v. Eaton Corporation (2016)
…similar products at the same time periods and worksites. Not uncommonly, plaintiffs have been unable to prove direct exposure to a given defendant's product." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 941 P.2d 1203, 1218 (Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (2014)
…951 (1995). Should either PPG or Corning breach a contractual duty it owes under the policies, Mt. McKinley may assert that as a defense in coverage litigation. Neither PPG nor Corning may claim that § 6.5…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…times, (4) PPG and PCC have joint insurance coverage, (5) PPG permitted PCC to participate in its insurance coverage program, and (6) provided certain services to PCC." In re Pittsburgh Corning, 417 B.R. at 296…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)
…. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)
…against Edelbrock Corporation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. \[1\] Edelbrock, LLC alleges it has been erroneously sued as Edelbrock Corporation. \[2\] Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986).
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · June 6, 2017
Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2017)
The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims against Weyerhaeuser and Owens-Illinois, and ordered plaintiffs' counsel to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Claims by employees whose asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 11, 2016
Ney v. Owens-Illinois (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2016)
…faith to block removal, so Owens-Illinois's late removal was timely and stood. Removal more than one year after commencement is allowed where the plaintiff acted in bad faith to prevent removal; joining a non…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 9, 2015
Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2015)
Denied Owens-Illinois's motion for summary judgment, which argued mootness, lack of standing and issue preclusion, so plaintiff Gary Suoja's claims continued; plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply was denied as…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 6, 2016
Ney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)
…at Bethlehem Steel from 1948 to 1953. A co-worker named only Owens-Illinois's Kaylo pipe covering and Quigley's Insulag spray as asbestos products at that site. Plaintiff sought documents and a corporate witness…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 12, 2017
Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. (2017)
The court granted Owens-Illinois's re-urged exception of res judicata, holding the 1996 release barred the Savoie family's mesothelioma, wrongful death and survival claims against Owens-Illinois. Under Louisiana law, a signed compromise…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · July 1, 2015
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
The district court denied Owens-Illinois, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment, finding enough circumstantial evidence of exposure for plaintiff McAlvey's claim to go forward. Under Illinois and maritime law, a plaintiff may use circumstantial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · November 10, 2015
Sydow v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2015)
The court found Owens-Illinois' motion to dismiss moot, denied 3M's and Weyerhaeuser's motions to join it, and granted Theresa Sydow's motion to file a third amended complaint substituting her as special administrator…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Boyer v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2014)
Strict Liability Plaintiffs' strict liability claim against Owens-Illinois is similarly flawed. To impose strict liability under Wisconsin law, the defendant must be "engaged in the business" of selling the alleged defective product. Geboy v. TRL…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017
Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)
The Seventh Circuit affirmed the judgment for Exxon Mobil and Owens-Illinois after a jury found cigarettes were the sole cause of Krik's lung cancer, holding that excluding Dr. Frank's causation testimony and the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 6, 2013
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…for reconsideration by Crane Co. and Owens-Illinois as moot. A plaintiff may use a Rule 15(a) amendment to disclaim damages for one product and so avoid federal officer jurisdiction. A defendant that did not…