No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

389 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 15 of 20

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Thurmon v. Georgia Pacific, LLC (2016)

    …component parts of its industrial valves. Both of these arguments fail. Georgia courts recognize a cause of action for injuries sustained on account of a manufacturer's negligent product design. See Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the framework for analyzing Defendant's first argument…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)

    …proceedings if he be so advised. \[1\] We have today rejected the substantial contributing factor analysis of proximate causation in cases tried under Virginia law when multiple sufficient causation is alleged. Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …fact exist as to whether the JBP used by Mr. Rothlein was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)

    …806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hendricks v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2015)

    …originally been filed in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see also Snow v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.2d 787, 789 (9th Cir. 1977). As the removing party, Defendant bears the burden of…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)

    …which occurred "during the 1960's through the mid-1980's." \[17\] "A \shade tree mechanic' is someone who maintains and repairs his vehicles himself." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ament v. John Crane-Houdalille, Inc. (2019)

    …court not sustained objections to those questions below. The Aments further assert that "Dr. Frank's testimony and opinions were exactly what was permitted and approved in" Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., 433 Md. 137 (2013)…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …of other suppliers. Id. at 209 (footnote omitted). \[5\] We will briefly comment upon an additional matter. On June 29, 2012, this Court filed its opinion in Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., \_\_\_ Md. App. \_\_\_, No. 536…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …of governmental safety regulations does not bar an award of punitive damages for egregious misconduct that they are ineffective in preventing. (Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 810 \[174 Cal.Rptr…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …viewpoint that, because science has failed to establish that any specific dosage of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d…

  12. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · July 1, 2015 · in the opinion

    Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2015)

    …thirteenth juror. See Meals ex rel. Meals v. Ford Motor Co., 417 S.W.3d 414, 420 (Tenn.2013) ("No verdict is valid unless approved by the trial judge acting as the thirteenth juror."). When a…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  14. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)

    …original asbestosis suit. Given our current state of medical knowledge, however, it is not even possible to determine with certainty which disease stemmed from what asbestos exposure(s). See Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer, 285 Va. \…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …evidence." (Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 543 \[138 Cal.Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857\], italics omitted, overruled on different grounds in Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 30, 2012 · in the opinion

    Ruppel v. CBS Corporation (2012)

    …give rise to liability. Second, the language in those four subparagraphs contain the hallmarks of negligence liability. See Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 955 N.E.2d 1138, 1153-54 (Ill. 2011) ("A product liability action. …

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)

    …232 S.W.3d at 770 (quoting Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton, 898 S.W.2d 773, 775 (Tex. 1995)); see also Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma, 242 S.W.3d 32, 46 (Tex. 2007). Thus…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)

    …2017), that courts must "\ensur\[e\] that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand.'" (citing Nease v. Ford Motor Co., 848 F.3d 219, 229…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)

    …a connection with the purchase or sale of a security, (4) reliance, (5) economic loss, and (6) loss causation." Gold v. Ford Motor Co., 577 F. App'x 120, 122 (3d Cir. 2014) (citing Dura Pharms.…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Flomenhoft v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2013)

    …summary judgment in favor of the defendants on a loss of consortium claim in an asbestos matter with nearly identical facts to the instant case. See Stevens v. Ford Motor Corp., 107 So. 3d 416 (Fla…