No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

683 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 15 of 35

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 28, 2011 · in the opinion

    Buttitta v. Allied-Signal, Inc. (2011)

    …BENDIX, LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTD., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., RAYMARK INDUSTRIAL DIVISION, UNION CARBIDE CORP., and UNION INSULATING CO., Defendants, and ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD., Defendant-Appellant. No. A-6117-09T4. Submitted May 25, 2011. Decided July…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Tishman Liquidating Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2014)

    …that users will heed warnings provided with a product" (id.). In the context of the issue that was before us in Union Carbide, that decision's citation of Santoro and recitation of the Santoro holding was…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · June 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    \[43\] Id. Ex. 1, at 128. \[44\] Smith, 2013 WL 214378, at [\5] (quoting Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 310 Ga.App. 21, 712 S.E.2d 537, 552 (2011)).

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

    … Pneumo Abex, LLC; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc.; and Union Carbide Corp. \[2\] The Court notes that 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c), the authority upon which Mrs. Glein relies for her "emergency" request for remand…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)

    …3 (J. Shah). Many other courts have rejected the Helsinki criteria for similar reasons. See, e.g., Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., No. CV RDB-16-1169, 2017 WL 3022969, at [\5] (D. Md. July 17…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion

    Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)

    …successor corporation to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., and as a successor in interest to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and BENDIX, LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTC., MULTIC-HEVROLET, INC., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., RAYMARK INDUSTRIAL DIVISION, UNION CARBIDE CORP., UNION…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)

    …SYSTEMS CORP.; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PNEUMO ABEX LLC; PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE SERVICES, INC.; UNION CARBIDE CORP.; UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendants. Civil No. 11-47-GPM. February 8, 2011. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. MEMORANDUM…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Estate OF Brust v. Acf Industries, LLC (2015)

    …Westinghouse Air Brake Company; TRINITY INDUSTRIES, individually and as successor to The Pullman Transportation Company and The Pullman Company; UNION CARBIDE CORP.; WABTEC CORPORATION, individually and as successor in interest to Westinghouse Air Brake Co. (WABCO)…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AJ Friedman Supply Co. (2010)

    …Inc., SVI Corporation, individually and as successor to Stockholm Valves & Fittings, Inc., T.J. McGlone & Co. Inc., the Anchor Packing Co., the Foxboro Company, the Walworth Company, Trilco Supply Company, Union Pump Co., Union Carbide Corp.…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · December 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. (2019)

    …181 L. Ed. 2d 347 (2011); June v. Union Carbide Corp., 577 F.3d 1234, 1249 (10th Cir. 2009) ("It is true that a number of courts have recognized \[medical monitoring\] claims ... premised on subclinical effects…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)

    …of Mississippi law. The Lohrmann test is "a de minimis rule in that a plaintiff is required to prove more than a casual or minimal contact with the product," Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., 130 So…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 21, 2017 · in the opinion

    Tallman v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …1988). The defense is applicable to both design defect and failure to warn claims. See, e.g., MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., Civil Action No. 13-831-SLR-CJB, 2013 WL 6571808, at [\3] (D. Del…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …by virtue of their employment, deemed to be sophisticated users."); Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp., 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 29-30, 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791 (2010) (rejecting argument that defendant "was entitled to rely…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …See e.g. McConnell v. Union Carbide Corp., 937 So.2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(carpenter who contracted asbestosis from inhalation of asbestos fibers during use of joint compound incorporating processed asbestos was entitled to…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …at p. 86.) In Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962 (Izell), the owner of a residential construction business was diagnosed with mesothelioma and sued more than 20 manufacturers or suppliers allegedly…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2012 · in the opinion

    Najolia v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. (2012)

    …within the past year to render decisions concerning the federal officer removal statute in the context of Navy specifications regarding asbestos. In Francis v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 11-2695, 2011 WL 6180061 (E.D.La…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Gottschall v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …court relied, has no application to the facts here, as illustrated by Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 28-30 \[117 Cal.Rptr.3d 791\] (Stewart) and Pfeifer v. John Crane…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)

    …based on sufficient facts or data for purposes of Fed. R. Evid. 702. Both Plaintiff and JCI rely on the court's decision in MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corp., 246 F. Supp. 3d 1004 (D. Del…

  20. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · February 13, 2019 · in the opinion

    Keene v. Cna Holdings, LLC (2019)

    …regarding his relationship with them and other family members and the void left by his death. As to punitive damages, the record shows that Celanese received from Union Carbide an asbestos toxicology report, dated December 16…