No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

389 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 16 of 20

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion

    Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)

    …the "single fiber" theory, and the "each and every exposure" theory. See, e.g., Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F.Supp.3d 841, 846 (E.D.N.C. 2015). \[12\] Ms. Barabin takes issue with…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)

    …S. 592-94. After considering these factors, courts are granted a "broad attitude" to determine admissibility. Clay v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 663, 667 (6th Cir. 2000). Admissibility does not require a perfect methodology…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …20] (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), on reconsideration on other grounds sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2015)…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …408, 421 \[generally, state has no legitimate interest in imposing punitive damages for out-of-state conduct\]; Aguirre Cruz v. Ford Motor Co. (W.D. Tenn. 2006) 435 F.Supp.2d 701, 705-706 \[collecting cases…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2012)

    …evidentiary findings of the MDL pre-trial court, because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex. 2002) (trial court does not abuse…

  6. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bryant v. General Motors Corp. (2015)

    …husband contracted and died from an occupational disease as a result of an injurious exposure to asbestos in the course of and arising out of his employment. See Snyder v. Ford Motor Co., 3d Dist. No…

  7. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Shaffer v. AW Chesterton Co. (2019)

    …¶ 10, quoting Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., Lincoln-Mercury Div., 28 Ohio St.3d 20, 502 N.E.2d 590 (1986), paragraph one of the syllabus. {¶19} In response to U.S…

  8. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)

    …a design defect when, "a design is itself inadequate, rendering the product unreasonably dangerous without regard to whether a warning is given\[.\]" Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 332 S.W.3d 749, 757 (Mo. banc 2011)…

  9. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Crane Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

    …Ford Motor Co., 2010 WL 3005539 (Del. Super. July 30, 2010), which held that Ford was not entitled to summary judgment under Pennsylvania law on a failure-to-warn claim where there were genuine factual disputes…

  10. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)

    …702. Thus, the trial court should not accept the expert's opinion at face value; it must independently [\179] examine and evaluate the reliability of each expert's opinion. Walker v. Ford Motor Co., 8th Dist.

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion

    Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)

    …702. Courts have condensed these requirements into two primary inquiries: "1) whether the proposed expert's testimony is relevant; and 2) whether it is reliable." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL…

  12. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · December 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Segroves v. Union Carbide (2015)

    …Woods, 777 S.W.2d 347, 349 (Tenn. 1989)). It is a "rule of rest," Moulton v. Ford Motor Co., 533 S.W.2d 295, 296 (Tenn. 1976), and it promotes finality in litigation, prevents inconsistent…

  13. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)

    …factor' in the duty assessment under Pennsylvania law." (citation omitted)); Cf. Miller v. Ford Motor Co., 740 N.W.2d 206, 209-10 (Mich. 2007) (holding the owner of "property on which asbestos-containing products were…

  14. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · July 27, 2016 · in the opinion

    Font v. Union Carbide Corp. (2016)

    …complained of resulted in a miscarriage of justice, or unless the \failure to give the instruction was reasonably calculated to confuse or mislead the jury.'" Force v. Ford Motor Co., 879 So.2d 103, 106 (Fla…

  15. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 28, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske (2012)

    …because they are reasonable and supported by the evidence. See Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 211 (Tex.2002) (trial court does not abuse its discretion if some evidence of substantive and…

  16. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · October 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Davis v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)

    …designing it so that it is reasonably safe for the purposes for which it is intended, and for other uses which are foreseeably probable\[.\] (Citations and punctuation omitted; emphasis in original.) Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Marteney v. Elementis Chemicals Inc. (2018)

    …Furthermore, we would reject it were we to consider it, as ratification through the acceptance of benefits requires knowledge of the relevant circumstances (Johnson v. California Interurban Motor Transp. Assn. (1938) 24 Cal.App.2d 322…

  18. Medical study · Medical research · 2014

    History and evolution of warning labels for automotive friction products

    …manual and on 1973 Bendix brake boxes. Later Ford, General Motors and Buick materials warned against compressed air and dry cleaning, and a 1993 Ford bulletin recommended non-asbestos parts. They reported that OSHA rules exempted…

  19. Medical study · Medical research · 2010

    The case for a global ban on asbestos

    …described industry-sponsored "product defense" science. They cited a court document stating that General Motors, Ford and Chrysler paid almost $37 million between 2001 and 2008 to scientist-consultants. They reported that efforts to list chrysotile…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Linsowe v. Hennessy Indus. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    General Motors (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1183.) We begin our independent review of the special verdict with the award of $532,685.37 in economic and noneconomic damages to Sharron Linsowe. The damages award…