683 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 19 of 35
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 2, 2013 · in the opinion
Swanson v. Simpson Timber Company (2013)
…Union Carbide was responsible for guarding against asbestos exposure. (Id. at p. 181.) The court relied on Olivo and concluded the independent contractor owed a duty to its employee's family members in spite of Union…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Stimson v. J-M Mfg. Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Ace Hardware Corp., 300 P.3d 202, 206 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). \[14\] Robinson v. Union Carbide Corp., 2019 WL 3822531, at [\11] (Del. Super. Aug. 15, 2019) (granting summary judgment where the record evidence showed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Hanson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2018)
…cannot prove causation, required for each claim, as a matter of law. In an asbestos action, "causation is an essential element." Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 712 S.E.2d 537, 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
McKENNEY'S Inc. v. Sinyard (2019)
…evidence. Sinyard's expert Dr. Abraham testified that a person can contract mesothelioma by inhaling asbestos fibers. While this is not a novel proposition, see Butler v. Union Carbide Corp., 310 Ga. App. 21, 25 (1)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
…a growing number of courts have recognized that the "every exposure" theory lacks sufficient support and have accordingly rejected such testimony. See, e.g., Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp., 266 F. Supp. 3d 839, 849 (D…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…It is the appellant's affirmative burden to demonstrate otherwise. \[Citation.\]" (Stewart v. Union Carbide Corp. (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 23, 33 (Stewart).) It is undisputed that Keeney served in the Navy for over 20…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 21, 2015 · in the opinion
Wilde v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2015)
…1983)). "Strict liability requires the plaintiff to prove that the vice or defect of the thing is a condition which poses an unreasonable risk of harm to others." Oubre v. Union Carbide Corp., 99-63 (La…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. (2015)
…a federal officer's directions when committing the acts that allegedly gave rise to the injury at issue to satisfy the causal nexus prong of the Mesa elements."); Francis v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 11-2695…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)
…f/k/a Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Union Carbide Corp.; Brightwater; and Owens-Corning Fiberglass. Lorillard contested DeLisle's use of Kent cigarettes. DeLisle testified that he smoked on average a pack of Kent…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · August 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Haney v. 3M Company (2015)
…From Mrs. Sherin's laundry exposure and the medical testimony, a jury could reasonably infer that Union Carbide's asbestos fiber was a substantial factor in causing Mrs. Sherin's mesothelioma." (internal citations and footnotes omitted));…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…Instead, the expert had testified that the plaintiff's cumulative exposure to all products contributed to causing his disease. (Butler v Union Carbide Corp., 712 SE2d 537 \[GA App 2011\]). The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 15, 2016 · in the opinion
DePREE v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…suppliers, jury could not infer without speculating that plaintiff was exposed to Union Carbide's joint compound as opposed to joint compound from other manufacturers, despite proof that Union Carbide joint compound was present at plant\]…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Templet v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated (2018)
…federal defense, (3) that it acted pursuant to a federal 2017 WL 2628103 (E.D. La. Jun. 19, 2017); Francis v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 11-2695, 2011 WL 6180061 (E.D. La. Dec. 13, 2011…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 24, 2015 · in the opinion
Quiroz v. BNSF Railway Company (2015)
…4th at p. 1084; see also Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 968-969 (Izell)\["\In the context of a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Murphy Oil USA (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Thomas v. A.P. green Indus. Inc., 933 So.2d 843, 853 (La.Ct.App. 2006). \[3\] See Smith v. Union Carbide, 2014 WL 4930457, (E.D. La. Oct. 1, 2014). \[4\] Roach v. Air Liquide…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · August 15, 2012 · in the opinion
Garner v. Ngc Bodily Injury Trust (2012)
…Inc., 860 F.2d 1434, 1439 (7th Cir. 1988) (CERCLA accrual date does not apply to workplace asbestos exposure); Ruffing v. Union Carbide Corp., 746 N.Y.S.2d 350, 362 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2002…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Peraica v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2013)
…relevant federal case law interpreting New York law in "failure to warn" cases, endorsed the proposition that "New York Law presumes users will heed warnings provided with a product ..." (Union Carbide Corp. v Affiliated FM Ins…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Corp., Civ. No. 15-4516, 2015 WL 9311967 (E.D.La. Dec. 23, 2015); Sroka v. Union Carbide Corp., Civ. No. WDQ-13-3281, 2015 WL 794942 (D.Md. Feb. 24, 2015); Holdren v. Buffalo Pumps…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Idaho · October 1, 2018
Stephens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2018)
The court denied Union Pacific's motion for judgment on the pleadings because it had waived its preemption defense, but granted Union Pacific summary judgment because the Stephenses lacked evidence of exposure and causation, and denied…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 28, 2019
Stephens v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2019)
The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and against William and Norma Stephens, because Stephens did not show that exposure attributable to Union Pacific was a substantial factor in causing his mesothelioma. Under…