No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

389 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 20 of 20

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · April 29, 2019 · in the opinion

    Sawyer v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)

    …Moskowitz Edelman and Dicker. SB Decking Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC & Joshua Franklin Kahn, Miles & Stockbridge P.C. General Electric Company, Cross Claimant, represented by Donald S. Meringer…

  2. Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · March 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rosling v. Associated Loggers Exchange (2019)

    …his hazardous exposure and OD, and the court therefore applied the ODA in effect on the date in which the period of employment which included his last injurious exposure ended.). \[4\] Ford v. Sentry Cas. Co.…

  3. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Koepf v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (2019)

    …employed as a sanitation worker. While emptying a trash container into the rear of his truck, Lowery was struck by a Ford Ranger traveling at a high rate of speed. Ultimately, Lowery was declared dead at…

  4. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)

    …It is not about what the family needs, it is about sending a message to a company who you've evaluated how they spend some of their money, you've evaluated some of their actions with…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Ridenour v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2014)

    …For purposes of considering whether Brown had exhausted his administrative remedies, this case was brought on June 1, 2010. See Ford v. Johnson, 362 F.3d 395 (7th Cir. 2004)(holding that a prisoner "brought suit"…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · June 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Hall v. Kodak Occupational Accidental Death Insurance Plan (2011)

    …pertinent part, as follows: 7.01 On-the-Job Injuries The benefits will be payable in the event that an Employee sustains a bodily injury in the course of his employment with the Company and, within…

  7. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · August 7, 2018 · in the opinion

    Mohn v. CBS Corporation (2018)

    …N.W.2d 308. In Peter, we analyzed an asbestos claim that sought application of an exception to the protections of the statute of repose for "\[d\]amages that were sustained before April 29, 1994." Id., …

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · April 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP (2015)

    …Burlington, which cites Lish, involved false statements made by an applicant to an insurance company in an insurance application, and the case dealt with a negligent misrepresentation claim [\86] under § 552 of the Restatement (Second) of…

  9. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Peter v. Sprinkmann Sons Corp. (2015)

    …claim because: (1) the damages exception in § 893.89(4)(d), allowing claims for "\[d\]amages that were sustained before April 29, 1994" applies because Donald's exposure to asbestos occurred long before April 29, 1994…