1,630 results for “General Electric”, page 20 of 82
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Melendrez v. Superior Court OF State OF California (2013)
…subd. (b).) The reason for this waiver should be obvious. As a general matter, when an individual verifies discovery responses, further discovery can be directed to that individual to determine the sources for the initial responses…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Friedman v. AO Smith Wter Prod. Co. (2014)
…defendant Appleton Electric LLC ("Appleton") moves pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross-claims asserted against it on the ground that there is no evidence that plaintiff Stanley Friedman was exposed…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion
Dean v. Bur. OF Workers'comp. (2010)
…Columbus, OH 43215, Kevin Reis, Assistant Attorney General, 150 East Gay Street, 22nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215, For: Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation; State Fund Employers, Muskingum Electric, Inc. & Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp, for Defendants-Appellees…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)
…breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2012)
…the order of November 1, 2011, denied Pennsylvania Electric's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. As a general rule, a magistrate judge cannot "determine" a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See 28 U.S…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Duffy v. CBS Corporation (2018)
666 carried the force of law due to the General Assembly not having codified that section, whether Scribner's reasoning was applicable to the statute of repose, or whether the manufacturer exception contained in CJP § 5…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 23, 2014 · in the opinion
Reera v. AO Smith Corp. (2014)
…the employees of another subcontractor, New England Insulation, were working in the same general area at Mystic as Reera, installing and maintaining older boilers and high-pressure steam lines. Plaintiff also alleges that Reera was exposed…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)
Brody's testimony to assist the jury's general understanding of mesothelioma in the same case. See Larson, 2010 WL 4676563 at [\3], n.3 (describing the Schumacher opinion). In Larson, Judge Robreno similarly upheld Magistrate…
-
Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · June 7, 2012 · in the opinion
Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. Co. (2012)
…for further proceedings. BACKGROUND\[1\] ¶ 2 In 1970, OG & E constructed an electric power generating plant, using an engineering [\942] and construction firm as general contractor. Mr. Olsen worked for an insulation contractor hired by OG…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · October 8, 2014 · in the opinion
Stevens v. CBS Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. V), 2014)
…mesothelioma, an asbestos-related disease, after having been exposed to asbestos-containing products manufactured by defendants CBS Corporation (a successor by merger to Westinghouse Electric Corporation) and distributed by International Paper Co. ("IP").\[1\] Specifically, he…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · December 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation Charlevoix v. CBS Corporation (2016)
…2013, a copy of which is available on the court's website, http://www.ded.uscourts.gov. \[1\] CBS Corporation is sued as a successor-in-interest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse"). (D.1. 147 at…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion
Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)
…the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · May 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau (2018)
…or the distance that Daniel Ahnert worked from any asbestos. He characterized his "general" report as a "review of the industrial hygiene literature as it relates to asbestos"—"kind of a rundown of asbestos information. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 31, 2014 · in the opinion
Netzer v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…without subpoena by defendants";\[8\] — May 26, 2014: Netzer to "name \most likely to use' general product identification fact witnesses from the original fact witness list who have previously been deposed";\[9\] — June 9, 2014: "Last…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)
…to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…other defendants after May 19, 1979. But applicable law imposes on plaintiff the burden of proving exposure to each particular defendant's products, not just proving exposure to asbestos in general. See, e.g., Hoffman v…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)
…money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)
…successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion
Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)
…Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138.) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to the issues presented by…