No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

585 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 24 of 30

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)

    …at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 26, 2015

    Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …because of disputed facts. Under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for, and owes no duty to warn about, asbestos-containing parts it did not manufacture or supply, and a plaintiff must show exposure to…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 24, 2015

    Shearer v. AW Chesterton Company (2015)

    …which governed work aboard a dry-docked Navy ship, a manufacturer owes no duty to warn about asbestos products it neither made nor distributed, so a turbine maker is not liable for insulation applied after the…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019

    Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …was not a joint venturer or principal of the operator, and did not undertake responsibility for worker safety owes no duty of care; workers who only incidentally benefit from a contract are not intended third party…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 4, 2013

    Barile v. 3M Company, Inc. (2013)

    …made by others. A landowner owes no duty to protect an independent contractor's workers from hazards inherent in the contracted work unless it controls the means and methods of that work. Statute of Repose; Failure…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · February 14, 2014

    Quirin v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)

    …where its valves needed asbestos components to function and those parts would be replaced with similar materials, but it owes no such duty for third-party insulation it did not supply. Product Identification; Failure to Warn…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 1, 2014

    Smith v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …plaintiff Miriam Smith's direct negligence claims. Under Louisiana law, a premises owner owes a direct duty of reasonable care to a contractor's employees, and a fact issue on breach can exist without proof the…

  8. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2017

    Poage v. Crane Co. (2017)

    …testimony about shared work on the valves, and the maker owes a duty to warn and to design safely where its valves required or specified asbestos gaskets and packing. Missouri's statutory cap on punitive damages…

  9. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…

  10. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018

    Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)

    …statutes), not on foreseeability or presumed risk creation. An employer therefore owes no duty to a worker's child for take-home asbestos, and the Third Restatement's duty framework is rejected. Take-Home Exposure; Wrongful…

  11. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · November 30, 2016

    Certainteed Corporation v. Fletcher (2016)

    …rule, and a defendant seeking summary judgment must show an absence of any evidence of defect. A manufacturer owes no duty to warn third parties, such as family members laundering a worker's dusty clothes, because…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…

  13. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · May 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Stockton v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …tenet of negligence law, stating that "Tennessee law currently provides that one owes a duty to refrain from engaging in conduct that creates an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm to others." Satterfield, 266 S.W…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Grabowski v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Bitco General Insurance Corporation V Dash Building Material Center, Inc. (2019)

    …BITCO has effectively reserved its right to request the payment of certain costs if the Court finds that it owes Dash a duty to defend or indemnify Dash in the state court lawsuit. \[10\] The Fifth…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · February 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Chesher v. 3M Company (2017)

    …above, the Conner court relied heavily on the Lindstrom decision in concluding that a manufacturer owes no duty to warn with respect to "asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." See Conner, 842…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015 · in the opinion

    Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)

    …airworthiness status of an aircraft. (ECF Nos. 111-3 through 111-5, ¶ 5.) He explains that "Boeing owns or controls all manufacturing specifications for all Boeing aircraft\[,\]" (ECF No. 111-3, ¶ 6), and provides similar statements…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Fogel v. American Int'l Indus. for Clubman (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)

    …issue of apparent first impression: whether a plaintiff is entitled to be placed in an in extremis cluster or must be transferred to a FIFO cluster where plaintiff alleges exposure to asbestos from ovens in Queens…

  19. Medical study · Medical research · 2019

    Pemetrexed-loaded nanoparticles targeted to malignant pleural mesothelioma cells: an in vitro study

    …is more effective than Pe alone in inhibiting MPM cell line malignant phenotype. The innovative use of specifically targeted GNPs opens the perspective of local intrapleural administration to avoid normal cell toxicity and enhance chemotherapy efficacy.

  20. Medical study · Medical research · 2018

    Tumor-specific genetic variants can be detected in circulating cell-free DNA of malignant pleural mesothelioma patients

    …time the presence of ctDNA within circulating DNA of treatment naïve MPM patients. This finding opens perspectives towards the use of ctDNA as a biomarker for (early and differential) diagnosis, treatment and treatment monitoring of MPM…