No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

1,630 results for “General Electric”, page 26 of 82

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion

    Oddo v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2015)

    …Inc. (Higgins") between 1947 and 1954; working as an appliance repairman for Westinghouse Electric in the late 1950s; working on diesel truck rigs for Cummins Sales & Services ("Cummins") in the 1960s; working for Lummis as an…

  2. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 22, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …Rule 15(a)\] is exemplified' by the words \and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.'" Harodite Industries, Inc. v. Warren Electric Corp., 24 A.3d 514, 530 (R.I. 2011) (quoting Medeiros v…

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · January 7, 2015 · in the opinion

    In re Energy Future Holdings Corp. (2015)

    …to Bar Date Motion and Asbestos Claims According to the PI Law Firms, both nuclear and electric power generation produces extreme amounts of heat. The presence of this heat necessitates the installment of insulation throughout power…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 10, 2014 · in the opinion

    In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2014)

    …Two studies of exposure to asbestos specifically from gasket removal work are inconclusive at best. There is a great deal of peer-reviewed scientific literature relating to asbestos exposure in general, with varying degrees of reliability…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Robaey v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)

    …Robaey's exposure to asbestos from Fel-Pro's gaskets contributed to her developing peritoneal mesothelioma. Fel-Pro's argument misconstrues the underpinnings of plaintiffs' expert opinions as to general and specific causation. Although both Dr…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)

    …526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 28, 2013 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)

    ….. an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the \sue…

  8. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)

    …asbestos fibers — were inhaled and became embedded in the lungs of the plaintiffs without their knowledge or consent. This, like the electric shock suffered by the plaintiff in Clark \[v. Choctawhatchee, 107 So.2d 609 (Fla…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Bucci v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)

    …and right lungs, which has spread to his brain. He is alleged to have been exposed to asbestos from approximately 1975 through the 1980s while employed as a general utility mechanic, mechanic B, and heavy equipment…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Moran v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2016)

    …supra, 43 Cal.4th 56, a manufacturer is exempt from its general duty to warn users of its product's dangerous propensities if the plaintiff, by virtue of his or her specialized training or profession, knows…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Genusa v. Asbestos Corporation Limited (2014)

    …claims against various defendants arising out of alleged asbestos exposure at Avondale Shipyards. Some of the defendants brought a third-party contribution action against Westinghouse Electric Corporation, the manufacturer of marine turbines for the U.S…

  12. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion

    Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)

    …as the doctrine; namely "wasted resources because of piecemeal litigation, the possibility of conflicting judgments, and a general concern that the courts may unduly interfere with each other's affairs." TPM Holdings, Inc. v. Intra-Gold…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Curry v. American Standard (2010)

    …no. 56 at 1). Second, Buffalo argues that Mr. Curry's testimony that most pumps were replaced on the Kitty Hawk is over-general, speculation, and insufficient to create an issue of fact. (Id.) Third, there…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Cicio v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    …and insulation. In the 1970s, Keeny worked for PSI, a division of Warner Electric, as a senior applications engineer and regional sales manager, where he inspected brakes and clutches at various commercial and industrial worksites, including…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Miller v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2019)

    …in Kennesaw and Woodstock, Georgia. She testified that all brake service done on the forklifts was performed in Georgia and that the Crown electric forklifts were clutchless (id. at 115:19-131:11). There are no…

  16. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · July 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    American Optical Corporation v. Spiewak (2011)

    …does not accrue, for limitations purposes, until the injured party discovers or has a "duty to discover the act constituting an invasion of his legal rights." Creviston v. General Motors Corp., 225 So. 2d 331, 334 …

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …trucks during the relevant time period." (Italics added.) To support this argument, Johnson relies heavily on a footnote in a recent Supreme Court opinion, Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc. (2016) 63 Cal.4th 167, 193…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …of 1963. (Id.) D. Plaintiff's product identification evidence Caterpillar Inc. Mr. Charlevoix stated that he performed maintenance work on eight Caterpillar bulldozers during his time at M.J. Electric. (D.I. 155, Ex. 1 at…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Vos v. Calhoon (2014)

    …1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 194, 200.) Moreover, the general rules of appellate practice also apply to our review of a dismissal following a demurrer sustained without leave to amend. (See Keyes v. Bowen (2010) 189…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …1972, at 11321. See also Asbestos Standard for General Industry, OSHA 3095 (1995). OSHA subsequently added requirements that employers ensure that employees remove asbestos-contaminated clothing only in the change rooms and that they not be…