585 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 27 of 30
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion
French v. AW Chesterton Company (2017)
…he identified one of Green Tweed's products as being a potential cause of his exposure. He testified that rope on the leveler doors of the coke ovens at U.S. Steel was manufactured by Palmetto…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · October 15, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair (2019)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Aston v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)
…permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 3, 2016 · in the opinion
US v. Silver (2016)
…38. When Steven Witkoff, who owns eighty-five percent of the Witkoff Group, learned that its fees to Goldberg & Iryami were being shared with Silver, he was furious because he believed the arrangement could be illegal…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · October 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Oneal v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute"). This Court likewise is persuaded that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
… 105 injunction restraining creditors from proceeding against non-debtors may be appropriate: when the non-debtor owns assets which will either be a source of funds for the debtor or when the preservation of the non…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · June 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Nix (2014)
…industry, and warnings and safety. Ziegler is a petroleum engineer who owns a safety and petroleum consulting firm and a small oil company. He had worked in the drilling industry since he was fifteen years old…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Knight (2015)
…support a recovery if the negligence of both be a contributing cause, even though one owes to the person injured a higher degree of care, and even though there be differing degrees of negligence by each…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · August 12, 2014 · in the opinion
In re GI Holdings, Inc. (2014)
…therefore conclude that plaintiff has a claim against defendant within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(4), and that defendant owes plaintiff a debt within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(11).
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)
…Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 14, 2019 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. AO Smith Water Prods., Co. (2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…original diversity jurisdiction when complete diversity of citizenship exists between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheller, LLC (2010)
…status and location of the property is also a significant factor. If the property is owned by the same entity that owns the real property, this suggests that the property may be an improvement to real…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Shook v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…litigation. See J&J Memorandum in Support of Motion to Fix Venue, ECF No. 1-5 at 17 ("Debtors claim that J&J owes them a duty to defend." (citing 1989 Agreement § 11 & 2011 Agreement ¶ 6))…