585 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 28 of 30
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)
…even one that owns all the stock of a subsidiary corporation\[,\] is not subject to liability for the acts of its subsidiary unless the parent so controls the operation of the subsidiary as to make it…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · September 30, 2019 · in the opinion
In re Duro Dyne National Corp. (2019)
…court to solicit and consider additional nominees on its own initiative after one has been proposed. A bankruptcy court, however, owes no deference to the debtor's—or any other party's— nominee. See, e.g.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018 · in the opinion
Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Polar-Mohr Maschinenvertriebsgesellschaft Gmbh, Co. KG v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2018)
…the policy period, including death at any time resulting therefrom." Id. at ZUR002026. Zurich also owes the policyholder a duty to defend, with defense costs covered in addition to the policy's limits. Id. at ZUR002027…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Kivell v. Union Carbide Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…is a distinction between hazards that are inherent in a defendant's premises (for which a premises owner owes a duty) and hazards inherent in an independent contractor's job (for which a premises owner does…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…determining whether a subsidiary corporation is a "mere instrumentality" of the parent corporation: (a) The parent corporation owns all or most of the capital stock of the subsidiary. (b) The parent and subsidiary corporations have common…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Battistoni v. ITW Food Equipment Group (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…washers, saws, choppers, and ovens (id.). Plaintiff further avers that the repairs included gasket removal and replacement of Hobart brand steamers, including brushing and sanding, as well as seal replacement on pipes and insulation thereon (id…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 11, 2015 · in the opinion
Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)
…1987) 845 F.2d 536, 541.) A vessel owner owes three duties of care to a ship repair contractor, commonly referred to as the "\"turnover duty," dealing with the condition of the ship when the owner…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion
Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)
…Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)
…a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Turcotte v. 3M Company (2018)
…Dec. 13, 2017.) At some point after his diagnosis and deposition, Mr. Turcotte moved to New Hampshire, where he owns a home and continues to receive treatment in that state. (Aff. of Gerard Turcotte ¶¶ 5, 6…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 8, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2019)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · November 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Young v. American Talc Company (2017)
…of factors: (1) "whether the defendant maintains offices or agents in the forum state;" (2) "whether the defendant owns property in the forum state;" (3) "whether the defendant reached into the forum state to solicit or…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)
…explained in a footnote that it was using the term "landowner" to refer "to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe." (Kinsman…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 25, 2016 · in the opinion
US v. Silver (2016)
…1905, 1914; GX 700. When Steven Witkoff, who owns eighty-five percent of the Witkoff Group, discovered that Silver was receiving referral fees, he was furious because he believed the arrangement could be illegal. Tr. 2038…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)
…on an analysis of facts and/or evidence. As detailed below, whether an insurer owes a duty to defend an insured, in a litigation brought against the insured, is an issue generally determined by considering the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Godfrey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …