585 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 29 of 30
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…cases, the Washington Supreme Court held, in relevant part, that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of an asbestos-containing product that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Simonetta…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…jurisdiction over WCD in Illinois, because WCD is a New Jersey corporation with a Connecticut principal place of business, WCD owns no property in Illinois, WCD has no offices in Illinois, WCD has no employees in…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…R.C. 2307.96(B), the statute provides no definition for the term "substantial factor." This lack of clarity opens the door to inconsistent application of R.C. 2307.96 and gave rise to this appeal. {¶…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Miller v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019 · in the opinion
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)
…days. As a maintenance man, Mr. Fontes removed and replaced steam line insulation twice a year on two ovens. According to Mr. Fontes, the insulation that was removed from the steam lines consisted of a grayish…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2012)
…personal jurisdiction. The Court should consider whether the defendant: engaged in business in this state; is licensed to do business in this state; owns, leases, or controls property (real or personal) or assets in this state;…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · September 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Hinson v. Continental Tire the Americas (2019)
…were layered together and pressed in a tire-building machine..... The "green tires" were then transported to the curing department. There were 147 clam-shell-shaped curing presses/ovens in the curing department..... The curing process…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · March 21, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Placid Oil Company (2011)
…that have been sued by the Post-Confirmation Tort Claimants. \[25\] Placid is now a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation and remains an active corporation that owns oil and gas interests. See Defendants' Exhibit 1-C…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC (2015)
…06), 923 So.2d 627. A premises owner owes a duty to persons on its premises to exercise reasonable care for their safety and not expose them to unreasonable risks of injury or harm. Mundy v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Christy v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…valves, generators, pumps, turbines, compressors, cranes, brakes, ovens, ladles, gloves and aprons. As a laborer installed wall board, used joint compound and worked with floor tiles. JOHN MARMARA: Living with lung cancer. Exposed from 1962-63…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 23, 2017 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Simon Greenstone Panatier Bartlett, Apc (2017)
…practice in Illinois, it maintains no records in Illinois, and that the Firm owns no property in Illinois. While Defendants do occasionally engage in litigation in Illinois or litigate against corporations based in Illinois, these contacts…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 22, 2013 · in the opinion
Santos v. AC McLOON Oil Co. (2013)
…I. 2008)). " \[A\] defendant cannot be liable under a negligence theory unless the defendant owes a duty of care to the plaintiff and that duty has been breached." Mallette v. Children's Friend and Service, 661…
-
Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion
Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)
…Beazer East, Inc., 219 Mich.App. 405, 557 N.W.2d 127, 132 (1996) (rejecting plaintiff's argument that entity that designed, manufactured, and installed coke ovens was a "supplier" for purposes of statute of repose).
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · February 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…registered as a foreign corporation in the state. (Id. ¶18.) Ford owns property in Pennsylvania, first registered to do business in Pennsylvania in 1920, and is currently registered as a foreign corporation in the state. (Id…