No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

683 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 29 of 35

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Klopman-Baerselman v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …discovery under FRCP 37, including "particularly wide latitude. . . to issue sanctions under FRCP 37(c)(1)\[.\]" Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist., 768 F.3d 843, 859 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Yeti by Molly, Ltd…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)

    …a coverage dispute. See American Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 343 Ill.App.3d 93, 97 (2003) (discussing targeted tender doctrine under Illinois law). Here "tender" simply means the…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …4th 148, 161.) Thus, it is generally "\amenable to resolution by summary judgment.'" (Kahn v. East Side Union High School Dist. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 990, 1004.) We review the existence of duty de novo. (Kesner…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2018)

    …to Abex Corporation & Dana Companies, LLC, sued as successor in interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company, formerly known as f/k/a Dana Corporation, Defendants, represented by Diane J. Kero, GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL. Union Pacific Railroad…

  5. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …255 (Iowa 1993). Punitive damages are discretionary and are never awarded as a matter of right. Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Cmty. Sch. Dist., 788 N.W.2d 386, 395 (Iowa 2010). Within the context of…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion

    Brucker v. CBS Corporation (2016)

    Harold Brucker, etal., Plaintiffs v. CBS Corporation, etal., Defendants Case No. 3:16 cv 206. April 20, 2016. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. MEMORANDUM OPINION JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge. BACKGROUND This…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Blouin v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2017)

    …Carey. Bexar Canyon Management, Inc., Defendant, represented by David A. Barfield, Pettis, Barfield & Hester P.A. CBS Corporation, Defendant, represented by John Joseph Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M. Bowlin, Frilot L.L.C.…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · June 18, 2010 · in the opinion

    Gennone v. AJ Eckert Company, Inc. (2010)

    …to whether there is: "(1) continuity of ownership; (2) cessation of ordinary business operations and the dissolution of the selling corporation as soon as possible after the transaction; (3) the buyer's assumption of the liabilities…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · March 2, 2010 · in the opinion

    Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Ray EX rel. Boyd (2010)

    693 F.Supp.2d 39 (2010) CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. James T. RAY, for the Estate of Harold F. BOYD, Defendant. Civil Action No.: 07-1148 (RMU). March 2, 2010. United States District Court, District…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …citations omitted). \[3\] District courts in this Circuit have followed Ebrahimi's lead on this point. See, e.g., Sperry Associates Federal Credit Union v. Space Coast Credit Union, 2012 WL 4762128, [\2] (M.D. Fla…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016 · in the opinion

    Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)

    …claim cannot be established, by presenting evidence that the plaintiff \does not possess and cannot reasonably obtain, needed evidence.'" (Kahn v. East Side Union High School Dist. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 990, 1003; and see Aguilar…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

    …v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 719 \["Error cannot be predicated on the trial court's refusal to give a requested instruction if the subject matter is substantially covered by…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …to render res judicata inapplicable, although the claims in the federal and state actions were essentially identical and based upon the same facts. In Graphic Arts Internat. Union v. Oakland Nat. Engraving Co. (1986) 185 Cal…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion

    Motions for Access OF Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2013)

    …STANDARDS This Court reviews the Bankruptcy Court's findings of fact for clear error and exercises plenary review over decisions of law. See Am. Flint Glass Workers Union v. Anchor Resolution Corp., 197 F.3d 76…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 2018 · in the opinion

    Chen v. Volkswagen Group of America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …and Ford's motion was filed on February 16, 2018, merely 4 months after Chen's oral examination, or 10 months after the commencement of this action (compare National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)

    …asbestos, Doc. No. 779-8, Viad Ex. E at 126-127; and (5) Cabasug was a member of the plumber and pipefitters' union, which provided publications including warnings regarding asbestos. Id. at 109; Doc. No. 779…

  17. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Reera v. AO Smith Corp. (2014)

    …b), a motion justice may certify an interlocutory disposition as a final judgment if two considerations provided for in the rule are met." Metro Props., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · June 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    In re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (2017)

    …Company, AIU Insurance Company, Granite State Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, and Lexington Insurance Company, and their parent corporations, divisions, assigns, predecessors and successors…

  19. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 23, 2019 · in the opinion

    Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Dickson (2019)

    …deposition testimony. Holstein testified the term "bystander exposure" was relevant to Billy's case because Billy was an engineer at Bell and, because of union rules, he was not allowed to touch any tools. As a…

  20. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2012 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2012)

    …could conceivably encounter. Imposing such an obligation would render all the warnings given virtually meaningless: "To warn of all potential dangers would warn of nothing." Andre v. Union Tank Car Co., 213 N.J.Super. 51…