1,676 results for “General Electric”, page 37 of 84
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2016
Thurmon v. Georgia Pacific, LLC (2016)
…the injury. Exposure to third-party asbestos gaskets used on the defendant's valves was not enough, and the court did not need to adopt a general 'bare metal defense'. Product Identification; Failure to Warn; Design…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 22, 2013
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2013)
…found that Crane's two declarations, from a Navy rear admiral and a historian of government documents, gave general information but nothing specific to Crane's products or to Mr. McMann. Crane offered no reasonably precise…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · September 30, 2013
Cary v. American Optical Corporation (2013)
…Watts moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Cary conceded there was no general jurisdiction but argued for specific jurisdiction and asked for more discovery. The court found it unclear whether Watts had purposely directed…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019
Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)
…cigarettes a day for about 37 years. Honda moved for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not prove general or specific causation. Several other defendants asked the court to bar plaintiff's medical experts and, if successful…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…where the plaintiff's exposure occurred in Toronto. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendant was not at home in Washington. Personal Jurisdiction Worksites: Toronto worked with brakes and clutches on Volkswagen vehicles Toronto 1986-1994
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 13, 2019
Nelson v. Holley Performance Prods. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…for a more definite statement as untimely. After Daimler, a corporation is subject to general jurisdiction only where it is incorporated or has its principal place of business, and specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a) requires…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 25, 2019
Gallagher v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…the plaintiffs' claims against it go forward. A defendant cannot get summary judgment by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof. Where the parties' experts conflict on general and specific causation, issues of fact remain…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2018
Hooper-Lynch v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…New York, transacts business here with an articulable nexus to the claim, supporting specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though there is no general jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction user of cosmetic talc powder 1968-1985
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · April 18, 2016
Genuine Parts Company v. Cepec (2016)
…8 Del. C. §§ 371 and 376) provide a means of serving process and do not constitute consent to general jurisdiction; after Daimler, jurisdiction over a registered foreign corporation must satisfy due process. Personal Jurisdiction; Venue, Removal…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 24, 2019
Djokic v. Steel Grip (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…s proof; it must show its product did not contribute to the disease, and conflicting expert opinions on general and specific causation raise fact issues. A consortium claim fails where the exposure preceded the marriage. Causation;…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2018
Stevenson v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2018)
…in part that the Florida federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The plaintiff conceded there was no general jurisdiction and argued for specific jurisdiction. She relied on the predecessor's Florida business registration and registered…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 19, 2014
Luna v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…not show which products were present when Mr. Luna's exposure began in 1963. It upheld the general damages given his pain and decline. It removed the court costs, as the siblings agreed the hospital could…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2012
Senger v. AH Bennett Company (2012)
…must raise a genuine issue of fact that exposure to the defendant's product proximately caused the injury. General coworker testimony about refinery work, which does not tie a particular decedent to the defendant's product…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 20, 2019
Alleyne v. Chanel (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…London. Chanel asked the court for summary judgment, arguing she could not show asbestos exposure from its talc and that her experts could not establish contamination or general causation. Chanel offered only an attorney's affirmation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · May 19, 2014
Horrie v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…as contracts or Navy warning requirements, that the government controlled the warnings and that this conflicted with state law. Crane's general affidavits did not do so. Failure to Warn; Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…altered it, or knew of the defect. A general allegation of failure to warn does not plead actual or constructive knowledge, so the defense appeared on the face of the complaint. Failure to Warn; Design Defect…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 25, 2018
Gibson v. Mack Trucks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…answer motion) is waived under CPLR 3211(a)(8). Registering to do business in New York does not by itself confer general jurisdiction after Daimler. Personal Jurisdiction; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Russell Transfer driver for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, since the plaintiffs relied on general expert statements about what manufacturers typically did. Griscom-Russell had dissolved in 1962…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 29, 2017
Walsh v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…was a substantial factor in causing the injury. The court found the Walshes' evidence did not support that inference and that they were stretching general testimony about replacement parts. Because they bore the burden of proof…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2012
Various Plaintiffs v. Various Defendants (2012)
…a genuine issue of material fact that exposure to the defendant's product proximately caused the injury. General testimony about the refinery and its work practices, without evidence tying a decedent to the defendant's product…